Originally Posted by
Dr.T
Moc7878, are you asking about breast implants or breasts? I am asking seriously.
Philbert the first paragraph of your post is ... confused. Attraction (the observer) has subjectivity, attractiveness (the observed) is measurable, widely studied, and objective. The studies you cite address the attractiveness of the breast. Both subpectoral and subglandular implant placement are used in cosmetic and reconstruction applications. Subpec is more common in the US. I will answer the question in your second paragraph tomorrow.
David A. Rowe I have several strong critiques of your post (troll?). There is no TONING. This is a word used in unscrupulous or ignorant fitness marketing (recommend reading: books and articles by Mark Rippetoe). Lifting weights nor any other form of exercise will make the breasts "perkier". This is either ignorant, a lie or a joke. Your advice is also bad regarding goal setting. Attractiveness goals, if present, should be defined in advance for all kinds of reasons. This is actually true of any goal for any endeavor. "Just jump right in, figure out your goals later! Don't wanna get too confused!" I will charitably assume the comment about "fake tits" is a joke, otherwise I will uncharitably assume you have never encountered any.
BigA see above.