And that's what you do when you make a big enough change in jobs, re-educate yourself.
I've had an unusually varied career from law enforcement, to the railroad police, to security in the defense industry, to managing contract security, and then back to the defense industry. I had a degree in criminal justice, which wasn't terribly applicable to life on the streets. Then the state required police academy. I had to learn railroad operations both on the fly in the rail yards, and then later and in greater depth with a company sponsored week long class. The defense industry required and entirely new set of skills in an emerging set of changes in security technologies and government requirements for protecting stuff like the B2 from people who weren't cleared to see it. I changed jobs twice in that industry and had to learn a new and stiffer set of requirements and still more new security technologies when the widgets I was protecting got even more sensitive. Got laid off and parachuted into the contract security business serving defense companies. Then, I had to learn sound business practices comprehending employment law, scheduling, HR, accounting, finance, and marketing of services. Just to name a few.
Your life changes and you have to come up to speed on what to do better, what to now, and what to do next. Change is a constant.
California. In the refineries. You want to know a little secret? There more $150,000-$200,000 jobs out there than you can believe--not just in petroleum.
But you have to know something and you have to WANT to work.
Think about it. My most valuable employee is the guy who relieves me of headaches which gives me the greatest gift of all--more time. I'm happy to pay for it.
Perhaps...but are they good at teaching someone to work--hard? I've hired (and fired) plenty of "geniuses" who wouldn't work. Almost invariably they had an engineering degree.
My original post was a concurrence with another poster on their experience in engineering. And was off topic.
I am amused by the 'need' for this position at the University. What prompted this? It is difficult for me to imagine that Princeton was the equivalent of some bar at closing time. That an effete ivy league institution has trouble with displays of aggressive masculinity is an oxymoron. Princeton culture likely exhibits the sophomoric behavior typical of people between the ages of 18-22. But this just strikes me as concern trolling from a CYA PC administration.
One of my brothers took the bar exam here in CA and passed it without going to law school (on his first try). California has some unusual benefits, and I have a brother who studied like crazy.
But more options for apprenticeship are sorely needed. It also demands that individuals be willing to buck the trend and be different. That's hard for a lot of people as they would rather do what "seems" normal and safe given convention and the current norm of college.
The handicap for this pathway for lawyers is that the "better" schools allow for better networking and better job opportunities after graduation. The status of the school matters for the same reason. This is less important for fields where such things are largely irrelevant, such as medicine. Nobody cares where you went to med school. Yale med offers virtually identical opportunities as your state school.