I do like Mike. He said it best in that video when he said RPE is meant for a controlled aggressive approach to training. Personality goes into training and for him obviously it works. For me personally i dont know if its a good fit. Whatever i do physically i tend to be overly aggressive both outside and inside the gym which obviously has its downsides as well. That being said i dont know if its a good fit for myself but I am not against trying it. I would really like Tom and some of the more experienced coaches to discuss this particular thing in detail to come closer to the truth of this matter by bringing their thoughts and analysis to the table. Maybe not worth their time but obviously a lot of us want to know more about it. You have your only RPE guys like Hanley and Tom on one extreme then you have the opposite people like Sullivan and Andy who say they dont use it at all with their clients.
Most of my clients only use RPE for secondary movements and accessory exercises, actually. I still have quite a few who use the full RPE system, but they number less than the people whose programs are based around percentages and APRE. FWIW.
Last edited by Tom Narvaez; 03-27-2017 at 09:10 AM.
Even Mike doesn't use "RPE only". For low intensities where RPE isn't as accurate, the programming will specify percentages based off a moderately heavy single. It's a tool and has to be applied appropriately.
Andy uses a different form of autoregulation in the article I posted, even if it doesn't use the RPE scale. Not saying he uses it all the time, but in at least one instance he is.
Sullivan said he doesn't coach advanced trainees - the population that would benefit the most from RPE.