starting strength gym
Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 94

Thread: The Great Density Block Experiment of 2017

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    958

    Default

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    From a systemic/overtraining standpoint, how would this system work is all lifts were done with density blocks as whole body workouts 3X a week. For example:

    Mon - Squat, Press, deadlift, (70%, deadlift at 80%) assistant bench

    Wed- Squat, bench, chins (80%), curls, tris

    Friday - Squat, Press, Deadlift (90%), assistant press

    Alternate deadlift every other week with SLDL or SGDL so not to over train.

    Is this a recipe for crashing and burning?

    One thing I like about D-Blocks that seems to not get any love here is that due to job, school family, kids, dog, etc...I don't have a lot of time for conditioning outside of the gym and when I run DB's, my heart beats like a motherfucker. I like the conditioning as a bonus. Last year, I did a 335 pound deadlift D-block and after 24 reps, I was as tired as I've ever been and in a previous life, I was a competitive 5-K runner.
    Last edited by OZ-USF-UFGator; 05-30-2017 at 09:26 AM.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    5,659

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OZ-USF-UFGator View Post
    From a systemic/overtraining standpoint, how would this system work is all lifts were done with density blocks as whole body workouts 3X a week. For example:

    Mon - Squat, Press, deadlift, (70%, deadlift at 80%) assistant bench

    Wed- Squat, bench, chins (80%), curls, tris

    Friday - Squat, Press, Deadlift (90%), assistant press

    Alternate deadlift every other week with SLDL or SGDL so not to over train.

    Is this a recipe for crashing and burning?.
    I would make Monday a light pull EVERY WEEK. So, maybe. SGDL or SLDL. Or even RDLs. I really dislike the idea of having a clock on for 90% deads (but I'm a hand-wringing nanny). I would just do a few singles or doubles for deadlift. Shouldn't take more than 15 minutes. Maybe alternate deads with rack pulls every week (I really respond to rack pulls).

    Also: maybe front squats on Wed.

    Quote Originally Posted by OZ-USF-UFGator View Post
    Last year, I did a 335 pound deadlift D-block and after 24 reps, I was as tired as I've ever been and in a previous life, I was a competitive 5-K runner.
    Shit man. Be careful doing stuff like that.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OZ-USF-UFGator View Post
    Last year, I did a 335 pound deadlift D-block and after 24 reps, I was as tired as I've ever been and in a previous life, I was a competitive 5-K runner.
    Quote Originally Posted by John Hanley View Post
    Shit man. Be careful doing stuff like that.
    Aww, are 5K's really that bad?

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    958

    Default

    Sub 18 minutes they are

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    6,767

    Default

    I'd be curious to hear the rational behind why INOL is anything but an ass-pulled metric? It's completely based off Prilepin's chart without any context. PC was based off Olympic weightlifters and Prilepin makes no mention of weekly frequency (or daily). It is just loading parameters to maintain optimal bar speed for weightlifters for one, single session. Hristov then extrapolates weekly amount of work from this chart? Huh?

    My experience: Prilepin's chart is too aggressive for most conventional deadlifters and not nearly enough work for most bench sessions. It works pretty well for squats. I'd be extremely wary of anything that claims to inform your weekly tonnage/work/NOL from this chart, though.


    On a completely different note, what is the "stop" during a given set in the block? @6? @7? Stop when you think the next rep isn't gonna be clean?

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    5,659

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Narvaez View Post
    On a completely different note, what is the "stop" during a given set in the block? @6? @7? Stop when you think the next rep isn't gonna be clean?
    Yeah. Probably about @7. Then @8 for the last ~ 2 minutes. Last set @9...@10 if I'm being short-sighted.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    6,767

    Default

    Thanks, John.

    Watching with interest.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    2,367

    Default

    I've been reading this thread and thought I'd chime in. Disclaimer: I'm not very strong at all and squat with an SSB only right now.

    About 6 months back, Jordan replied to someone's question with a training template:

    Day 1:
    Squat x 6 @ 8, then 12 min AMRAP at same load in sets of 3
    Press x 6 @ 9, then 12 min AMRAP at same load in sets of 3
    Chins -10 min AMRAP
    Arms- 10 min AMRAP
    Prowler

    Day 2: off

    Day 3:
    Deadlift x 6 @ 8, then 12 min AMRAP at same load in sets of 3
    Bench x 6 @ 9. then 12 min AMRAP at same load in sets of 3
    Pull ups- 10 min AMRAP
    Arms -10 min AMRAP
    Steady state cardio PRN

    Day 4: Off

    Day 4:
    Paused squat x 6 @ 9, then 12 min AMRAP at same load in sets of 3
    Incline Bench x 6 @ 9. then 12 min AMRAP at same load in sets of 3
    Pendlay Rows- 12 @ 9, then 12 min AMRAP at same load in sets of 6
    Arms-10 min AMRAP
    Prowler
    I've roughly followed this since January, except for 12 weeks in which I hurt my back and spent that time rehabbing it, and building back up again.

    Prior to starting this, I had worked up to a squatting 220x5x5 on the SSB, with 5 minute rests and the last set in the rpe 9.5 territory. Bench was at 192.5x5x5, with 5 minute rests and damn near every set was rpe 9-10 except for the first. I think deadlift was somewhere around 315x3, 325x3, 335x3, 315x3 with the 335x3 set being around rpe 9.

    I'll start off by saying that the above template does not save me any time. That may be my own issue, but a squat might take me 15 minutes to hit my top set. I'll typically do warmups, one set 10-15% below my intended top set to help guide me, then my top set. Then, after resting 3-5 minutes from that top set, I set the timer and go. So, let's call it 35 minutes to squat.

    After hitting my top set, I would get between 4-6 sets of 3, where 5 was really the sweet spot. That ends up being an average of 21 total reps (not including the 1 set below the top set) in under 20 minutes. I am pretty much going every 90-120 seconds in between sets here. The first one or two suck as I feel like I've not fully recovered from the top set. The next two feel smooth. Then, by time I get to the last one, its around rpe 9.5. FWIW, if I overshoot rpe and end up taking 5-10% off for the AMRAP, or don't add weight to the last session, I try to get more sets in the same time period.

    I ran this for about 6 weeks before I stopped making progress. I got my squat to 240x6@8 and 5 sets of 3 in 12 mins. Then I started to regress 2 weeks in a row and I've moved everything to a top set of 5 with 2's during the AMRAP. The AMRAP with 2's means going every 60 seconds (75-90 later in the 12min) and getting about 7 sets. I made a slightly aggressive jump on squat this week and managed 245x5@8, then only 5 sets in the 12min. I'll work on adding sets before I move up. Bench was 195@8.5 and 7 sets in 12 min. For deadlift, I switched over to sumo and am doing a top set of 3 with 1's during the AMRAP. I don't really have a good reference or comparison here, but I did 345x3@8 then 8 singles in 12 min.

    Anyways, I don't know if I've truly made much progress here or not, but I like it. If planning to run this longer than 4 weeks, I think I would actually start with x8 then 3's for 3-4 weeks, then x5 and 2's for 3-4 weeks, then x3 and 1's for 2-3 weeks. Just thought I'd share my experience as it is similar to what is going on on this thread.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    No one cares.
    Posts
    4,654

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Narvaez View Post
    I'd be curious to hear the rational behind why INOL is anything but an ass-pulled metric? It's completely based off Prilepin's chart without any context. PC was based off Olympic weightlifters and Prilepin makes no mention of weekly frequency (or daily). It is just loading parameters to maintain optimal bar speed for weightlifters for one, single session. Hristov then extrapolates weekly amount of work from this chart? Huh?

    My experience: Prilepin's chart is too aggressive for most conventional deadlifters and not nearly enough work for most bench sessions. It works pretty well for squats. I'd be extremely wary of anything that claims to inform your weekly tonnage/work/NOL from this chart, though.


    On a completely different note, what is the "stop" during a given set in the block? @6? @7? Stop when you think the next rep isn't gonna be clean?
    Of course it is an ass-pulled metric. It seems to be a handy index to track volume & intensity and nothing more. Indices are not meant to be very quantitative, and I used it to cook up the loadings for the three press sessions within the week. As I mentioned, knowing what the indices were for my past ~8 weeks (average 2.35-2.5), that seemed like a good place to start. Coupled with Hanley's suggestion of two different intensities, I used it and the Prilepin chart to set up two blocks and a session with heavy singles.

    So, excluding the efficacy of Prilepin for powerlifters, are 30 reps at 70%, 20 reps at 80%, and 5 reps at 90% not a good idea? If it isn't - what is a better set & rep scheme?

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    5,659

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by Chebass88 View Post
    So, excluding the efficacy of Prilepin for powerlifters, are 30 reps at 70%, 20 reps at 80%, and 5 reps at 90% not a good idea? If it isn't - what is a better set & rep scheme?
    Yeah, I don't shit about INOL, but I looked at the numbers Chebass proposed (using INOL) and they looked very, very close to my old MRV numbers (~48 hours) for overhead press.

Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •