starting strength gym
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Different progression strategies

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    357

    Default Different progression strategies

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,936

    Default

    #inb4RPEisbullshit

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Land of Shadows...
    Posts
    4,987

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by manveer View Post
    #inb4RPEisbullshit
    preach it brother

    I find grinding myself into a fine powder is the most optimal way to do it

    bulgarian training-->your body is lying to your mind

    #dontletyourfeelzingzfetindaway

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    West Bend, WI
    Posts
    10,925

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marenghi View Post
    Thanks for sharing!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    116

    Default

    So he considers LP to be "arbitrary"?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Oakland and Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by autumnal View Post
    So he considers LP to be "arbitrary"?
    It is strange, because 2.5-5kg jumps is predetermined in his example, so that's not arbitrary. However, the decision to switch from 5kg to 2.5kg based on when you think or feel like you'll slow down or stall is arbitrary. Then again, predetermining the weight drop based on feel and performance (i.e. setting 2.5kg as a hard number for dropping weight) is not arbitrary.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    6,767

    Default

    I'm finding that too many people conflate RPE training with the old school Tuchscherer fatigue drops, repeats, etc.

    You can easily do 4x4@8 instead of the whole workup to x4@9 and then load drop deal. It's less complicated and really effective.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,830

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by manveer View Post
    #inb4RPEisbullshit
    How do we address purism in a world that maximal effort training and submaximal volume may work well together?
    Arbritrary or not, load and rep goals are still pushed even when RPE is supposed to be regulating the effort, it is just a tool not a system. The need to meet the overload principle does not stop when you autoregulate or make a plan to train submaximally.
    Having arbritary load rep and set goals from time to time is a way to push beyond what you would normally allow. But you cannot live off of that full time.
    Last edited by Bryan Dobson; 07-17-2017 at 01:39 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bryanccfshr View Post
    How do we address purism in a world that maximal effort training and submaximal volume may work well together?
    Not sure what you mean by this^, but:

    Quote Originally Posted by Bryanccfshr View Post
    Arbritrary or not, load and rep goals are still pushed even when RPE is supposed to be regulating the effort, it is just a tool not a system. The need to meet the overload principle does not stop when you autoregulate or make a plan to train submaximally.
    Having arbritary load rep and set goals from time to time is a way to push beyond what you would normally allow. But you cannot live off of that full time.
    I agree with this^. I was kidding with my post, just anticipating someone coming in and saying that.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,830

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by manveer View Post
    Not sure what you mean by this^, but:



    I agree with this^. I was kidding with my post, just anticipating someone coming in and saying that.
    My first quote is poorly worded way of questioning training using only one set of principles. For example training only heavy maximal singles or training only sub-maximally for volume with no periodization are both equally poor choices.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •