starting strength gym
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The Barbell Prescription Book, Table 16-1, Page 162

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2

    Default The Barbell Prescription Book, Table 16-1, Page 162

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    I have a question about The Barbell Prescription book and I'm not sure where to ask it. It's about recovery, so I thought here would be a good place.

    It's about Table 16-1, page 162, the sample weekly diary of meals. I'm looking at the totals on the bottom of calories, protein, carb and fat. My question is this: shouldn't the total calories of protein, carbs and fat add up to 100% of the calories? Using the Monday example:

    Total calories: 2480
    protein: 236g x 4 calories = 944 calories
    carb: 175g x 4 cal = 700 cal
    fat: 130g x 9 cal = 1,170 cal

    944 + 700 + 1170 = 2,814 cal

    Maybe the 4 cal per gram for carb and protein is wrong or the 9 cal per gram for fat. Maybe I'm just trying to be exact and that it's simply not possible.
    Last edited by steve16; 03-11-2017 at 02:57 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    420

    Default

    Looks like you caught a misprint (see possible correction below), although it doesn't seem too significant, assuming the daily protein, carb and fat numbers are correct, the point about higher carbs and calories on training days remains. Also the average comes out about the same for both macros and calories.

    Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
    Calories 2311 2814 2113 1988 2552 2108 2247 2357
    Protein 212 236 207 186 235 207 198 213
    Carb 145 175 85 158 160 140 105 194
    Fat 98 130 105 68 108 80 115 81
    Last edited by VikingCellist; 03-12-2017 at 04:22 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Farmington Hills, MI
    Posts
    4,689

    Default

    It's a typo. We'll fix it in the next printing/edition. Thanks.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Thanks.

    Since you're here: on page 154, footnote 6-- is that reference missing from Notes in the back of the book?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    699

    Default

    The book is outstanding. Steve, I am glad you are poring through it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •