+ Reply to Thread
Page 11 of 21 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 205

Thread: Body Fat Estimation Thread

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Toronto ON
    Posts
    2,198

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subsistence View Post
    Certainly up to you. I try to cut when I hit 15%, so you can see my different school of thought (and probably where I get my info from).
    I've never been 15% before so it's not like I'm missing something I used to have.. I'll get there soon enough.

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    2,348

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skipbeat View Post
    I've never been 15% before so it's not like I'm missing something I used to have.. I'll get there soon enough.
    you may never want to go back lol

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Bothell, Washington
    Posts
    4,361

    Default

    4a9ecc57fd.jpg













    If you said, 22.3% (as per DEXA), you win the internet.

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    SF, CA
    Posts
    3,158

    Default

    Hmm... what's the height and weight? also do you know what model DEXA machine and if a GE brand which column that reading's from?

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Bothell, Washington
    Posts
    4,361

    Default

    Dunno, mate. Got it off another thread on this site. It is also a common photo in those articles about determining bf% visually. Just thought it was interesting because it makes me skeptical of some of the numbers I get from the Navy Method.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    281

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Narvaez View Post
    Dunno, mate. Got it off another thread on this site. It is also a common photo in those articles about determining bf% visually. Just thought it was interesting because it makes me skeptical of some of the numbers I get from the Navy Method.
    Back in July, calipers put me at 6.7% or something like that. They were done with 11 sites, all tested 3x by an experienced person. Knowing that calipers can be off ~3%, I rounded up to 10% because I am not diced/shredded to the bone/BB comp ready. The navy method coincidentally also put me around 10%. I would say its fairly accurate when compared to calipers. The thing that can throw it off though is any kind of bloat or full stomach etc.

    As far as DEXA, I've never had it done so I can't comment much. I do know that everyone who I've heard has gotten DEXA has read MUCH higher than expected.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    SF, CA
    Posts
    3,158

    Default

    In 4-hour Body Ferris mentions that he went off one day and got his fat measured as follows:
    3-point SlimGuide calipers: 7%
    Accu-measure (*) : 7.1 -9.4
    BodyMetrix Ultrasound: 9.5%
    DEXA: 11.3%
    BodPod: 13.3%
    Omron hand held bio: 14.7%-15.4 %
    4-site SlimGuide calipers 15.46%-16.51%

    *- that's a 1-point caliper i think.

    That's some significant variation between measurement methods. I've also read elsewhere of people getting BodPod readings of like 10% and 15% the same day so i'm somewhat skeptical on that one though it's supposed to be pretty good. Probably operator error in some way or maybe an air leak. Don't know.

    (Note that dexa can be off too, but the new GE ones claim an accuracy of +/- 300g fat. (assuming the machine is correctly calibrated and in good repair) but that's 1.3lbs. If you're low fat, say ~10%, that's a 1 percentage point range. )

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,670

    Default

    What happened to weighing yourself submerged in water? I thought that was the most accurate method.

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    1,881

    Default

    This is a good series of articles discussing various body fat measurement techniques and the strengths/weaknesses of each:

    http://weightology.net/weightologyweekly/?page_id=146

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    281

    Default

    Not sure why my edit didn't come through on my last post, but

    Fat cells, after depleted of triglycerides, will hold water. It is not until the water is gone that the fat cell shrinks. I wonder if on something like a DEXA scan, this stored water can show up as fat mass (since it is accumulated in fat cells). That would mean that bodyfat levels could show higher than what they technically are. I think this makes sense mostly because the water in muscle tissue is measured as lean mass.

    /end bro science

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts