+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 300

Thread: Does any man really want women to look like this?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    664

    Default Does any man really want women to look like this?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,904

    Default

    a gay man

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    6,964

    Default

    They dont care if men like how they look, it is not a beauty pageant. The same way pro male bodybuilders do not appeal to normal women. These people are human freakshows for those people into bodybuilding but to much of a pussy to take all the roids themselves.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dastardly View Post
    These people are human freakshows for those people into bodybuilding but to much of a pussy to take all the roids themselves.
    Real men do roids. You heard it here first.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stonerider View Post
    a gay man
    this

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alexis View Post
    they probably dont find your puny weakling muscles attractive either (NB. Im just messin')

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    393

    Default

    Didn't bother with watching the 'tube.

    Just an FYI, this board, and pretty much any board related to strength training and/or bodybuilding, has some degree of self-selection for men that like man-like women.

    So you're certainly not going to get any answer on here, re: typical male preferences for certain female body types, that is at all reflective of the modal preferences of Western males.

    The modal (and you should probably google "modal") preferences of the male for female body types runs towards those women with the obvious secondary sexual characteristics of the female of the species, while lacking the obvious secondary sexual characteristics of the male of the species. BTW it might be worth googling "secondary sexual characteristics" as well.

    One fascinating thing about "beauty", and I believe OKCupid had a blog post about this, is that the more deviation a woman has from "conventional" beauty, the more (1) divided people were about her, and (2) the more messages she got from those that were fans of her type, i.e. those that were attracted were REALLY attracted.

    -----------

    Total side point, serious question: are so-called "natural" female BBs allowed chesticle implants? If so, that doesn't seem quite cricket.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,904

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by algunos hombre View Post
    One fascinating thing about "beauty", and I believe OKCupid had a blog post about this, is that the more deviation a woman has from "conventional" beauty, the more (1) divided people were about her, and (2) the more messages she got from those that were fans of her type, i.e. those that were attracted were REALLY attracted.
    Maybe I'm thinking of something else, but I thought the context of that blog was not that men were more attracted to the less-hot girls, but that guys were more likely to message them, because the guys assumed the hot girls would be getting too many messages from people already.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    393

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stonerider View Post
    Maybe I'm thinking of something else, but I thought the context of that blog was not that men were more attracted to the less-hot girls, but that guys were more likely to message them, because the guys assumed the hot girls would be getting too many messages from people already.
    That's part of the context, but not all of it. Another part of the context was that the "universally hot" girls got less messages than the "niche hot" girls because the "niche hot" girls' fans were very rabid fans.

    While the "girl with the dragon tatoo" is a fugly look to most users, there is a small subgroup to which she is God's Gift, so those in her "niche" message the hell out of her and she gets lots of attention.

    This is how it is here with the women that have many male secondary sexual characteristics; lots of strength-training men are in the subgroup that like those women, so boards like this "upvote" them while the modal response in the general population is (cue bad British accent) "That's a MAN, Ba-by!"

    The cheerleader thread from a while back is a good example. Mainstream most guys were like "ugg" and most girls would rather have 58 zits than have that much muscle, but here there was a lot of "would hit that" commentary.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,904

    Default

    i probably missed that thread

    which is for the best... i'm a fan of the mainstream hot, not overweight "strong" chicks

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts