+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6
Results 51 to 56 of 56

Thread: Is natural peanut butter really better?

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,070

    Default

    The solution is for people to breed less, not to kill off large sections of the population by starvation. Mass starvation is pretty much the second-worst-case scenario, after extinction. Using it as a solution to overpopulation is like saying "good thing my buddy died of cancer; he might have died of cancer otherwise".

    Besides, the earth can feed quite a few more people than it currently does. Starvation is a distribution issue.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    6,872

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrofula View Post

    Besides, the earth can feed quite a few more people than it currently does. Starvation is a distribution issue.
    True. The USA often has a grain surplus which they actively try to avoid because gluts makes the prices crash, which means the govt need to pay farmers more subsidy.

    The UK & EU also pays horrendous amounts in subsidies and there are often surpluses of a lot of things, so much so that people dump milk, vegetables and more back into the ground as there is not enough demand for them and no money to be made.

    Overpopluated developing countries may struggle to produce enough actual food for their populations, but they are often rich in natural resources amongst other things. But are stuck in poverty due to politics and corruption.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke
    Posts
    4,159

    Default

    So... governments pay to grow certain crops. Crops become overabundant, are then disposed of to prevent loss of crop value. Government basically bins it's money for the benefit of farmers, is that right?

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    St. Augustine, FL
    Posts
    1,416

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jon cowie View Post
    So... governments pay to grow certain crops. Crops become overabundant, are then disposed of to prevent loss of crop value. Government basically bins it's money for the benefit of farmers, is that right?
    Yes.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    SF, CA
    Posts
    3,158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hatmanii View Post
    Yes.
    To a certain degree this is merited for, or can be put down to, maintaining production capacity for strategic security reasons.

    But mostly, "yes" for tactical political reasons.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    St. Augustine, FL
    Posts
    1,416

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by veryhrm View Post
    To a certain degree this is merited for, or can be put down to, maintaining production capacity for strategic security reasons.

    But mostly, "yes" for tactical political reasons.
    Yes.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts