+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 133

Thread: Spotting ATG Squats?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    6,430

    Default

    "The hamstrings losing tension when lowering past the point of full stretch in a correct-depth low-bar squat. "

    And if you have the flexibility to go lower while maintaining tension?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    452

    Default

    I have never seen an ATG squat without the knees sliding forward. I don't know enough about biomechanics to make any concrete statements, but Rippetoe says that the correct depth of a full squat is when the hamstrings and the rest of the muscles involved reach their full stretch points. This is typically within an inch or so below parallel, from what I have seen.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    6,430

    Default

    "the rest of the muscles involved reach their full stretch points."

    Wouldn't that point depend on the flexibility of the person involved?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    452

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe
    Thanks for bringing this up. Squat depth is critically important, but so is correct form. ATG-level depth most usually requires that the lumbar muscles relax the lordosis and that the hamstrings relax before extreme depth can be reached. It doesn't sound like a good idea to me that anything be relaxed in a deep squat, since doing this kills your good controlled rebound out of the bottom and risks your intervertebral discs. Those rare individuals that can obtain ass-to-ankles depth without relaxing anything might be able to get away with it, but as a general rule you should squat as deep as you can with a hard-arched lower back and tight hamstings and adductors. This depth will be below parallel, but it will not usually be "ATG".
    I'd say this sums it up. Possible, but not probable.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    452

    Default

    I thought that I had seen Rip say somewhere before that ATG is not achievable with his requirements for the squat. It looks like I'm probably mistaken.

    So, yes, assuming one is flexible enough, then ATG is fine. However, I think that's a big "if".

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Berryman View Post
    I have never seen an ATG squat without the knees sliding forward.
    Where do you live?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    452

    Default

    Earth.

  8. #28

    Default

    Than we might be neighbours. :-P

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    358

    Default

    What a bizarre couple of posts...

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    Posts
    3,390

    Default

    I've watched a good number of people do low bar squats and have yet to see someone go ass to grass without relaxing something. This includes a few hyper mobile females. You can squat with high bar mechanics with the knees further forward and a more upright torso while keeping the bar lower on the back, but that's pretty damn awkward. It wouldn't surprise me if there's someone out there that can manage a real low bar squat with hamstrings to calves, but such a trainee is certainly not common.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts