+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 97

Thread: My Balls Are Bigger Than Your Balls

  1. 06-22-2012 09:45 AM #21
    Corrie
    Corrie is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    4,755

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spar View Post
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1608910.html
    HAHA, wow. The Stern interview was about a year ago and back then he seemed pretty unhappy with this condition.

    I guess he's enjoying his celebrity.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-22-2012 11:19 AM #22
    Mike C
    Mike C is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,707

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCG View Post
    Once? I'm hurt that you think he'd even have that chance.
    IDK...my money's on Will. He's EXPLOSIVE!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-22-2012 12:20 PM #23
    tertius
    tertius is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Queen Anne, Seattle, WA
    Posts
    8,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Will D View Post
    Have you seen my legs? Here they are again.
    Riiight. Your 20 whatever inch legs, on your 6'3" 175 pound frame.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-22-2012 12:24 PM #24
    Mike C
    Mike C is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,707

    Default

    yeah he's lying about his numbers...lets see a pic with a measuring tape
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-22-2012 12:25 PM #25
    The Emancipated Freak
    The Emancipated Freak is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    2,874

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Will D View Post
    Have you seen my legs? Here they are again.
    Excellently mediocre quads paired with transparent adductors. If you want big legs I recommend lifting heavy things.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike C View Post
    yeah he's lying about his numbers...lets see a pic with a measuring tape
    Be sure to have the tape at the biggest point on your leg. For the sake of science.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-22-2012 12:37 PM #26
    Will D
    Will D is offline Reverse Hypertrophy
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    358

    Default

    HAHAHA okay what are my numbers, in the name of broscience.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-22-2012 12:45 PM #27
    tertius
    tertius is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Queen Anne, Seattle, WA
    Posts
    8,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Will D View Post
    HAHAHA okay what are my numbers, in the name of broscience.
    Oh, no, I think it's possible that that your legs are that big, flexed, after a workout.
    I just think the rest of you is very wee, given 175 and 6'3". I'm an inch shorter, and I know what 175 pounds looked like on me, and my legs weren't that big.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 06-22-2012 01:00 PM #28
    Will D
    Will D is offline Reverse Hypertrophy
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tertius View Post
    oh, no, i think it's possible that that your legs are that big, flexed, after a workout.
    I just think the rest of you is very wee, given 175 and 6'3". I'm an inch shorter, and i know what 175 pounds looked like on me, and my legs weren't that big.
    hahahahahahahaha
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 06-22-2012 01:01 PM #29
    The Emancipated Freak
    The Emancipated Freak is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    2,874

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tertius View Post
    Oh, no, I think it's possible that that your legs are that big, flexed, after a workout.
    I just think the rest of you is very wee, given 175 and 6'3". I'm an inch shorter, and I know what 175 pounds looked like on me, and my legs weren't that big.
    I'd believe his claim of 24'' legs. It's two inches less then mine, I weigh around the same and I'm about 5 inches shorter. What I don't believe is his claim that his legs are impressive.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 06-22-2012 01:09 PM #30
    tertius
    tertius is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Queen Anne, Seattle, WA
    Posts
    8,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Emancipated Freak View Post
    I'd believe his claim of 24'' legs. It's two inches less then mine, I weigh around the same and I'm about 5 inches shorter. What I don't believe is his claim that his legs are impressive.
    Yeah. Hence, the rest of his is very wee indeed.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
+ Reply to Thread
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules