.
Last edited by Rachel Crass; 07-05-2012 at 01:45 AM.
.
Last edited by Rachel Crass; 07-05-2012 at 01:45 AM.
.
Last edited by Rachel Crass; 07-05-2012 at 01:45 AM. Reason: why state the obvious
.
Last edited by Rachel Crass; 07-05-2012 at 01:46 AM.
I have always looked at all versions of cleans like this: it is explosive, athletic movement. Therefore it should be not so forced in terms of execution. Understanding vertical path and a to b and efficiency has unquestionable inclusion in the discussion. But so does natural movement. Anyone I have taught the PC with a strict adherence to vertical bar has refused to continue using them. It just feels awkward and they feel they can lift the weight up but the form hijacks ability.
Some of the main issues are the arms and double knee bend. Arms straight has them thinking arms slack. So they may have force transfer through straight bones but no tension in the muscles. I think that slows down the movement at the second pull. And with the vertical bar focus the knee bend, after you straighten the knees, is very awkward. Like two separate movement instead of one continuous pattern.
With a natural movement the bar sways as the body needs it to. Scoops in, rolls up, blasts off. The person can then just focus on force output and speed. The vertical bar may be more efficient for the bar, but is it more efficient for the body? Is it too robotic to maximize the way the body moves?
Bookmarks