+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: 531- prescribed weight for more reps? More weight for planned reps?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JM3 View Post
    So, Jon- do you feel like you are ever/often in a position where your programmed weights are lighter than you feel you can do?

    Im definitely looking better on this program than TM- but Im trying to get to 405 on dead and Id really like to get a 200lb overhead by the end of the year.
    Im at 365 dead for 2 and 165 overhead for, I think 2. I find it hard not to cheat on overheads though, so Im staying in the 150s until all my reps have zero hip involvement- hard.
    I'd work the program and then test myself at the end of the year. Make sure you up your 1rm to base the % off of each month and I don't think there should be any reason your not at a 405 1rm dl by the end of the year. Just because you are using something as your working % 1rm, doesn't mean that you don't have the capability of doing more. That's really more a marathon program instead. I've read where guys got great gains out of it using relatively light 1rm as their working %.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    West MI
    Posts
    1,412

    Default

    Wendler will respond to questions like these if you ask him. Was 365 the weight for your last 1+ set? Are you doing normal 5/3/1 or one of the new variants? If it was your 1+ set, take the rest week, hit it hard next month, and don't accept anything less than three reps on your 1+ set at 375. Then after the rest week try the 405. Or wait another month.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    1,315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JM3 View Post
    I find it hard not to cheat on overheads though, so Im staying in the 150s until all my reps have zero hip involvement- hard.
    Why no hip involvement? That's ok according to SS.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tzanghi View Post
    Why no hip involvement? That's ok according to SS.
    He probably wants to make the shoulders do more work in the lift.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    6,841

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allent View Post
    Wendler will respond to questions like these if you ask him. Was 365 the weight for your last 1+ set? Are you doing normal 5/3/1 or one of the new variants? If it was your 1+ set, take the rest week, hit it hard next month, and don't accept anything less than three reps on your 1+ set at 375. Then after the rest week try the 405. Or wait another month.
    It was my 1+ set. and Im inconsistent with my assistance work- I hit one 5x10 or 5x8 set of the movement then usually do bodyweight stuff, I would say normal 5/3/1.
    Im doing 5lb increases on the major weights- I recalculated to get more challenging weights (hence the question) and now have no problems with things feeling 'light'
    Im in new territory now- and am appropriately humbled.

    In terms of hip involvment- I sort of glanced at the revision Rippetoe wrote- probably should look at it again, but I understood full extension of the hip to be ok- but Im snapping my knees on some of my reps. I hit 155 overhead for 4 or 5 yesterday, with nominal snap- but a press is a press and Im push pressing some of my reps despite myself- trying to eliminate that completely iffn I can.

    Ive never actually tested my 1rm on anything. Maybe its time to do that now.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    1,315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JM3 View Post
    In terms of hip involvment- I sort of glanced at the revision Rippetoe wrote- probably should look at it again, but I understood full extension of the hip to be ok- but Im snapping my knees on some of my reps. I hit 155 overhead for 4 or 5 yesterday, with nominal snap- but a press is a press and Im push pressing some of my reps despite myself- trying to eliminate that completely iffn I can.
    That's pretty much it. He says no knee bend, just shove the hips forward under the bar right before your press and once you get the bar out over your head you shove your hips back under the bar to help it into lockout.

    Not that I'm an expert, but I might suggest a deload and some short term LP because it's hard to stick with a weight and keep doing it 'til you get a change in form if the weight is too hard. Just a thought; hope your press works out either way.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    6,841

    Default

    But that would entail using common sense.....

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    1,315

    Default

    hahaha don't worry, I don't take my own advice; I do the same thing.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    6,841

    Default

    Very easy to rationalize when 3 out of 5 is perfect, or when the movement is almost imperceptible - then theres the rep where the bar disappears over head and the shoulders are flexed up top- and I flush with push press shame.

    Once a totally out of shape guy on the graviton took an interest: that's an Olympic lift isn't it? I muttered yes and quiclkly slunk away...

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke
    Posts
    4,194

    Default

    Don't feel bad, Brian Blessed said that the bench press is an olympic lift, and he benches 400lbs (and always has, according to Brian Blessed).

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts