+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Is Sushi Paleo?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,598

    Default Is Sushi Paleo?

    I'm thinking so. Fish and vegetables. Sometimes there is rice but it plays a secondary role. Other thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    6,430

    Default

    Sugar in the rice.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,047

    Default

    Toxins from the ocean in the seaweed. Glutens in the soy sauce. You'll probably die.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    293

    Default

    yes, mostly.

    no to the newer/trendy stuff like "dynamite shrimp avocado tempura battered tuna" rolls

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    432

    Default

    Proper sashimi, yes. Yo! Sushi, probably not.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,580

    Default

    Jamie is right in that the main consideration is the rice. But paleo doesn't bar "sugar" in particular or even carbs more generally -- it's just good sense to keep an eye on how much of it you're taking in. But you have to know that a big chunk of sushi rice is going to spike the shit out of your blood sugar, which can be a perfectly fine and even desirable thing in some instances, so just keep it in mind. But sushi is so mind-bogglingly delicious... it'd be like giving up steak to go without it.

    A point of confusion some people have is that sushi rice is sometimes called "glutinous" rice, which sounds a lot like the word "gluten". Since sushi rice is sticky, and gluten makes things stick together, it might make some sense, but it's *not* gluten. So if you're gluten intolerant, you're fine to eat sushi.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lahaina, Maui
    Posts
    2,269

    Default

    Rice is a grain and grain is not paleo. Right?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    293

    Default

    My impression was white rice doesn't contain any "anti-nutrient" type properties, like wheat/gluten. Flipside is it doesn't have additional benefits (minerals/vitamins) like a potato would.

    So, not particularly harmful or helpful.

    Nice source of calories if you need to up them (in before carb haters)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmoye View Post
    Rice is a grain and grain is not paleo. Right?
    Nah, not quite right. If rice is polished it's fine. Sort of like potatoes -- if there is an anti-nutrient, it's in the skin. If the husk is removed, the rice doesn't contain anything that would irritate the gut.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    331

    Default

    This thread is a good example of how retarded paleo is.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts