Rip,
I wonder if you are fighting a battle that you cannot win, as you are effectively trying to prove something that is false.
The statement being debated here is 'Rip changes posts'.
I believe it to be false, but I can't see how you could convincingly prove it to be false. Unless in some way you published ALL the traffic to your website, so that people could see the posts as they arrive to you before you moderate them and then compare how they subsequently appear on these pages, there is little you can do to convince the doubters and the perjurers.
The burden of proof is theirs really, and proving the statement to be true would be quite simple: just exhibit ONE message as was posted to you, and then show that it appeared heavily redacted, or didn't appear at all.
And yet, lots of people seem to think you are the one that should prove the rumors wrong, a frankly unenviable position (is this an example of Argument from ignorance ? you are better than me at logic).
I think it's the same position of athletes who pass all the drug tests possible, and still people think they are juicing. Atheltes cannot prove they are clean; it can only be proven they are dirty, but some people cannot accept this fact.
IPB




Bookmarks