+ Reply to Thread
Page 22 of 23 FirstFirst ... 12 20 21 22 23 LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 230

Thread: Romneys Tax Returns

  1. #211
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,598

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conway View Post
    Dividends and capital gains are not necessarily the same thing. Dividends are from corporate profits in proportion to your ownership. Capital gains can come from many different things, such as securities increasing in value, or your home increasing in value. I was being very specific about dividends for a reason.
    Okay, substitute "dividends" for "capital gains". My point remains the same.

    I like how you decry the "double taxation" of investors, who contribute only their money to the corporation, but not of the workers who contribute their sweat and skills.

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    934

    Default

    The workers weren't double taxed or I would decry this too. I have previously decried the whole FICA tax system of hidden government taxes on wages, but this is also different. Employee wages are part of costs, not profits, and therefore not taxed by the government before disbursement. I would be in favor of increase the taxation on dividends to whatever the standard corporate tax rate is, and dropping corporate taxes to zero.

  3. #213
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,598

    Default

    Like I said earlier, take your plea to the American people. Those poor corporations and their investors. Life in the boardroom is so unfair.

  4. #214
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    934

    Default

    I don't discount your opinion, I am just debating the facts. It was someone else who said double taxation was a myth, I argued it isn't. Arguing whether this should or should not be the case is an entirely different thing.

  5. #215
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    1,038

    Default

    So... If a company pays no taxes, but does pay a dividend... Would you say that was double taxation?

  6. #216
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    934

    Default

    No.

  7. #217
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    1,038

    Default

    So then whether or not dividends would be taxable to the recipient would be based on whether or not the corporation had taxable income? That would be an administrative nightmare...

  8. #218
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    934

    Default

    Easy answer - don't tax corporate profits. The dividends would be taxed on the recipient end as income. Corporations can't really share profits they don't have.

  9. #219
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    793

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conway View Post
    Easy answer - don't tax corporate profits. The dividends would be taxed on the recipient end as income. Corporations can't really share profits they don't have.
    IIRC, Germany has a system (or "had", they might have changed it) where corporations were allowed to deduct dividends distributed from taxable income. So that's another way to do it.

  10. #220
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    934

    Default

    Yep

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts