starting strength gym
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Question on pull ups and bench press

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    797

    Default

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    I don't understand how Scott proposes to add more muscles to the bench press,
    Apparently by protracting the scapulae to add the serratus to the movement and increase the distance the bar travels, at the expense of shoulder stability. It doesn't seem like a good idea to me, but I haven't written any books or owned any gyms.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Mark, I thought that active shoulder at the bottom of a pullup or chinup was defined as keeping the shoulder in an anti-shrugged position. At least that's what the CF people say. Am I mis-interpreting this?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,668

    Default

    Everybody is misinterpreting. 1.) The range of motion of the bench press does not increase if the shoulders are shrugged forward, because the range of motion around the shoulder joint does not increase when the scapula is shrugged up by the serratus. The bar may move a little farther, but the angle the humerus travels around the glenoid is the same, the stability on the bench is decreased, and the scapula is placed in a position where it is more likely to impinge when shrugged forward like this. 2.) Impingement is not a problem with either overhead pressing movements or overhead pulling movements if they are done correctly, with the scapulas shrugged superiorly and medially at the top of the press and hanging that way at the bottom of a pullup, because the bony components that could impinge are separated by the shrugged position. And 3.) the bottom of a pullup and the top of a press are not equivalent positions because the pullup is applying tension to the shoulders while the press is compressive -- the forces are acting in opposite directions, and countering the forces requires two different types of contractions. An "anti-shrug" at the bottom of the pullup is useful for decreasing the ROM if you are concerned about how many pullups you can do with any form in a finite amount of time, but decreasing the ROM also decreases the amount of muscle involved if you are concerned about using the pullup to strengthen as much muscle mass as possible. Using the pullup for metcon is a different thing than using it for upper-body strength.

    And see this thread for more: http://strengthmill.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1668

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    6,635

    Default

    What would you say about the push-up plus, with the anterior shoulder motion? WOuld these be okay since 1) the weight is lighter and 2) the floor is more stable than the bar.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,668

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Pushups have traditionally been the exercise of choice for problems involving the serratus anterior, for this reason. They are good because it's okay to shrug your bodyweight forward for higher reps with your elbows in a typical pushup alignment, with your body at an angle down toward your toes.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •