Originally Posted by
Leah Lutz
As Tom mentioned I am a fairly recent SCC. I will give you some background, as I agree with Wolf that this all likely depends on your starting point. Someone who has been coaching, has a background in several key areas, like anatomy, physiology, and physics will likely have a fairly quick prep time. This was not where I came from. :-)
I have no previous background in coaching, although I do have extensive experience in teaching, and I am confident that this has been very helpful. If I can explain things to middle schoolers, I can figure out how to explain the SS models to clients. I have experience in yelling loudly, being assertive when giving directions, communicating with an order of instruction, evaluating quickly and decisively, and in paying attention to how instruction/evaluation is being received and acted on.
I do not have an athletic background myself, and my studies have long been more in the Liberal Arts, the Trivium if we want to be exact, not the sciences. I attended a seminar in 2014 just to learn the lifts. I had done some CrossFit for a couple of years before this, but I went to learn all I could about strength training. I loved it, and I was discovering that I love training. I kept training (and being coached by an SSC), and then decided to attend a seminar in 2015 to take the exam. I was seeing more opportunities to coach, and I was asked for more and more help. I LOVE strength training, it has changed my life, and I was excited to coach others.
I read the books, watched videos, brushed up on anatomy, and coached some people in person in the few months before attending. I went and passed the platform exam. Then the written exam came. I did not pass that my first time. I was pretty upset, but after some reflection, I knew it was a very fair evaluation and it spurred me to be far more aggressive in preparing myself. I brushed up on a bunch of physics, studied more A/P, and coached A LOT of people. This time I made sure I was coaching a wide variety of people-those with training experience who might not just accept everything I told them, all ages, people from CF, people with no training experience, people who already moved pretty well and those who could barely squat the bar.
I also put myself in more situations where I needed to explain the SS models. I didn't go out and pick fights or anything, but I made sure I was entering into conversations about low bar/high bar squats, training vs exercising, programming, etc. I also took far more time to review videos posted so I had practice in looking for and seeing what the SSCs here commented on.
All of this coaching, talking, thinking, and studying was incredibly worth it, and failing my first exam was just what I needed. I lacked coaching experience the first time. I went back 6 months later to retake the exam and passed. By that time, I had really internalized the models, could communicate well about many of the ideas surrounding SS, and it was crystal clear to me that the old me should NOT have passed. I went into my first exam with plenty of lifting experience and understood quite a bit about SS. I went into my second exam feeling like a qualified coach, knowing as I sat in the seminar and then took the exam that I was ready for it this time.