Can someone explain to me the Millennial resistance to buying a pair of f#$%#% weightlifting shoes?
It's not like it is 1990 and when finding the damn things was practically a quest for fire.
I ask as I've taught the basic lifts to maybe half a dozen men, and one woman, over the last five years or so. I'm certainly no great coach and haven't handled the volume of people a professional would.
But despite keeping up with their lifting the entire time I knew them only one, the lady, bothered to buy proper shoes.
It's not like they are that expensive and all of these people had jobs.
Am I just routinely dealing with morons?
And I've heard just about every possible excuse from "my Converse work fine" to "bringing an extra pair[of shoes] to the gym is too much trouble."
What is the deal with this?
I don't understand it myself. Every seminar or camp at WFAC, we have to have this same conversation with people who have paid us to come.
Worse than that is people who lift barefooted, in commercial gyms. Its just fucking gross.
I recently graduated but there was a gym room in college that was purposed for weightlifting and powerlifting. No treadmills or no machines.. just racks, barbells, bumper plates, and a roman chair.
That room would get pretty crowded, sometimes reaching capacity, but pretty much everyone would be wearing weightlifting shoes, save for a couple novices and one guy I can remember wearing converse.
In commercial gyms I've noticed a lot more reluctance. People, even young guys squatting and deadlifting over 400, don't want to appear over invested or something, but will still take steroids and come in with a big bag of lifting gear.
I think part of it is that in competitive WL countries there's just more homage paid to the sport, so it's all good if you want to take it more seriously, but here in the US it's like borderline antisocial to wear a pair in a commercial gym.
Great line.
As for reasons, consider the folks:
Lack of experience. I posit that if they squatted in a pair, they'd rush to purchase.
It seems like a lot of people use these abilities in an interchangeable fashion during discussion. Basically as synonyms for someone's genetic athletic potential. But I would think that they are all different attributes.
A couple examples of what I mean:
Are all these things related (having more of 1 means you will likely have more of the other) or are they separate abilities?
You think explosiveness and recovery are synonyms?
I do not. Hence my post.
Since I do not use these terms interchangeably, I'm puzzled that you asked me. Is all.
Looking Back on 4 Years of Lifting – A Geezer Perspective –Gene Banman
You Need to Learn How to Power Clean –Mark Rippetoe
Highlights from the StartingStrength Community. Browse archives.