Reply With QuoteYeah, they fucked with John's protocols to the extent that the study was standard ExFizz nonsense. Not his fault, I assure you.
Member
Petrizzo study
I'm surprised there's no thread on this:
https://www.asep.org/asep/asep/JEPon...8_Petrizzo.pdf
Apparently, only 60% of the subjects made gainz to 12 weeks.
But I see it looks like they only gained but a few kilos of body weight.
Can not ANYONE, DTFP? jeesh!
TMPHBITEU
Yeah, they fucked with John's protocols to the extent that the study was standard ExFizz nonsense. Not his fault, I assure you.
Member
In what way?Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe
Member
Looks like by allowing participants to ignore The First 3 Questions. Participants were told to eat as they normally would, determine on their own their rest between sets, and determine their load progression. Participants also determined training frequency, and I may have missed it but I also didn’t see sleep/rest mentioned, other than the note about minimizing other sports stuff.
Member
The one person who dropped out from injury did so because of medial epicondilytis. Couldn’t that have been from a bad arm position in the squat? Should the study have mentioned either that the coaching/form observance ruled that out or at least allowed for the possibility that it was related to/caused by this person squatting? Am I wrong about the injury?
✓ Member
"choices regarding rate of linear
progression, frequency of training (2 or 3 non-consecutive d·wk
-1
), and rest between sets were
left to the discretion of the subjects"
That said, I thought it was interesting that the subjects that chose the higher rate of progression were NOT less likely to fail out...
-->Adam
Posting Permissions