Originally Posted by
DanielAcorn
The real issue here is language and labels. I don't deny Hubbard's existence, I merely suggest he/she/whatever needn't have to chop off their penis and take medication if there was no barriers in sport/life/whatever. My article is actually super liberal. I talk about 'humans' and the best 'human' winning. I make note that it's progressives who do not want a super progressive world. They'd rather barriers be erected and new labels be imposed (to later be challenged).
Incidentally, I actually, funnily enough, don't really know what I'm talking about. All of this is intuitive - it was just a fun article to write, off the cuff. I could be wrong about everything. I do know, though, that 'progressives' are ironic (title of the article) for the reason stated above.