starting strength gym
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: Strength and Height Differences

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    7,102

    Default

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    Whoa. There are graphs and stuff in this discussion... I can't compete with that. But, since the prime movers in the pertinent lifts are 3rd class levers, a longer bone would decrease the mechanical advantage around the joint, which would necesitate a stronger force from the muscle fibers to move the same load. So if we use the stupid, traditional "contractile potential" measure, I guess the taller guy would be stronger because the muscle fibers have to pull harder on the less mechanically advantageous limb. But if we use the "practical application of force" argument you could either say that the taller guy is moving the same load farther, which may or may not be "more practical," or you could say that the smaller guy, who's contractile potential is less, is getting a higher ratio out of the contractile potential/practical application of force.

    Don't lifting meets have some method of determining the strongest athletes by body weight? Does that have any impact to this discussion?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    6,635

    Default

    The work done by a powerlifter is significantly less than that done by a weightlifter. Power is lower as well. The powerlifter, however, produces a much higher force on the bar.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,685

    Default

    Perhaps this needs to be restated, Jamie.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Spartanburg, SC
    Posts
    2,541

    Default

    The guy who can lift the tractor, equipment, rubble, whatever, off his buddy is stronger than the guy who can't and lets his buddy die. Debate over. Get strongER.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    142

    Default

    I like 'How far?' and 'How much?' for my answer to the strength question; and 'How far?', 'How much?' and 'How long?' for the power question.

    Strength and Power are used as synonyms so readily for so long they have lost meaning almost altogether..... hence necessitating very good threads like this one.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    4,909

    Default

    This thread is making my head hurt.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Fremont, CA
    Posts
    418

    Default

    Here's my question:

    If the there was a deadlift competition where success was only measured by bar distance who would win?

    Let's say the competition was done in a power cage with the pins set at 24". Each lifter just has to touch the pins with the bar for a good lift. Which of these lifters, the tall one or the short one, would win?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    216

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mlentzner View Post
    Here's my question:

    If the there was a deadlift competition where success was only measured by bar distance who would win?

    Let's say the competition was done in a power cage with the pins set at 24". Each lifter just has to touch the pins with the bar for a good lift. Which of these lifters, the tall one or the short one, would win?
    So you're asking who would be stronger in rack pulls, short or tall people? I suppose it depends on whether the individual lifter is stronger on the first half or the second half of the pull...the 24" would be at a completely different part of the body of a 6'4" person as a 5'4" person.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RRod View Post
    Work = Force x Distance is only valid when the force is *constant* over the distance. So if the force vs. distance curve deviates at all from horizontal line, you gotta go to the more complicated formulas given here:
    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/wcon.html
    Luckily, this situation is straightforward enough that we don't actually need to integrate or make assumptions about how the force production changes. Total work done is simply the potential energy gained by the bar, mgh (m = mass, g = gravitational constant, h = height). m and g are the same for both lifters, so work is directly proportional to the final height of the bar.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    La Jolla California
    Posts
    2,285

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric K View Post
    ...But, since the prime movers in the pertinent lifts are 3rd class levers, a longer bone would decrease the mechanical advantage around the joint, which would necesitate a stronger force from the muscle fibers to move the same load. So if we use the stupid, traditional "contractile potential" measure, I guess the taller guy would be stronger because the muscle fibers have to pull harder on the less mechanically advantageous limb.
    As a tall, naturally "skinny fat" person, I believe this to be correct. WHen it comes to weightlifting/powerlifting, longer levers require greater strength. Period. Whethere more work gets done or more power is generated depends on the aforementioned time and distance variables.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •