Originally Posted by
Pluripotent
No. This is changing the argument. The original assertion was that "The world is clearly driven by random events has no inherent meaning, and the universe is absurdly huge and disinterested." This is a statement of believe, not skepticism. I for one did not become a skeptic just to substitute one belief system for another. He may have ment to make a skeptical argument, but was he said was religious. Sorry for pointing this out. I cannot read his mind, just his forum post, and I suppose I am just not generous enough to assume a skeptical argument, just because he is attacking the proper group.