Originally Posted by
JNussbaum
I am all for friendly disagreements, and I agree with Mark on most things. The thing I don't get around here is that when someone like Dan John says something, it is just a friendly disagreement, but when people post in the forum making very similar arguments we get things like this...
"It wasn't disrespectful at all. It was just wrong."
"The same part of your brain that fails to understand the concept of training."
"THINK"
"You don't know what you're talking about. Go away."
"The whole panoply of human intellectual and emotional inadequacy, condensed for your convenience."
The inconstancy is what is confusing. It is also confusing to be called rude and foolish by someone who is always willing to insult people in the harshest terms possible when they disagree with him.