starting strength gym
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35

Thread: The role of the olympic lifts in training programs

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fayetteville, Arkansas
    Posts
    1,200

    Default

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    Think about this: does putting the 16-pound shot make you strong? After all, big strong men throw the shot.
    I don't know if you're agreeing with me or not lol

    I understand the distinction here. It's a small one, but an important one. I can see how this could get very frustrating trying to show it over and over again.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,661

    Default

    It's not a small distinction -- it is critical to the methods currently being applied in S&C. Strong men have clean & jerked in the mid-500s. Did they get strong enough to do this by doing the clean & jerk? All of them? If so, how? If not, what did they do? Why?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    645

    Default

    I thought it was simple enough: squats, presses, and deadlifts train strength.
    Power cleans demonstrate the strength the trainee has gained. It's not a movement used to train strength. The only thing you're "training" in the power clean is the power clean technique (assuming form is kept well). It's also a great way to guage your overall power after strength training to see the effects of it. It also allows for a sort of an active recovery between deadlifts in the later phases of The Program.
    That's my understanding of it.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fayetteville, Arkansas
    Posts
    1,200

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    It's not a small distinction -- it is critical to the methods currently being applied in S&C. Strong men have clean & jerked in the mid-500s. Did they get strong enough to do this by doing the clean & jerk? All of them? If so, how? If not, what did they do? Why?
    I agree with you here. I was simply trying to explain the difference to the new guy.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    658

    Default

    Let's hypothesize that your deadlift to clean ratio is 65%. It just is.
    Let's say you train SS without doing any Power Cleans, and you increase your deadlift to 400.
    Theoretically, your Power Clean should be 400 x .65 =260lb. But it's not, because you haven't practiced the lift nor have you practiced exploding your new strength into action rapidly. So despite having the potential to clean 65% of your dead, at this moment you're only able to clean maybe 50%.

    Now let's say you ran the LP and included power cleans, and again increased your deadlift up to 400lb. You now have a pretty good shot at realizing (expressing) your full genetically-endowed ability to call motor units into action quickly and hit the 260.

    Bonus Math Points if you can answer this question: which is likely to be both the faster and the surer way to increase the Power Clean to 280:
    A) endeavor to improve power clean technique thereby raising the percentage to 68%, or;
    B) increase maximal deadlift strength to 435 while settling for the 65% ratio?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,661

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Been View Post
    Let's hypothesize that your deadlift to clean ratio is 65%. It just is.
    Let's say you train SS without doing any Power Cleans, and you increase your deadlift to 400.
    Theoretically, your Power Clean should be 400 x .65 =260lb. But it's not, because you haven't practiced the lift nor have you practiced exploding your new strength into action rapidly. So despite having the potential to clean 65% of your dead, at this moment you're only able to clean maybe 50%.

    Now let's say you ran the LP and included power cleans, and again increased your deadlift up to 400lb. You now have a pretty good shot at realizing (expressing) your full genetically-endowed ability to call motor units into action quickly and hit the 260.

    Bonus Math Points if you can answer this question: which is likely to be both the faster and the surer way to increase the Power Clean to 280:
    A) endeavor to improve power clean technique thereby raising the percentage to 68%, or;
    B) increase maximal deadlift strength to 435 while settling for the 65% ratio?
    As concise an example as is possible to draw. They will still not believe it.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Portola Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,250

    Default

    This is a subject I've been mulling over ever since reading SS. The OP hit on the key issue for me with his question. That is, we are leaving acceleration out of the analysis. For all of this to make sense, that the standing jump isn't really trainable but the power clean can keep up proportionately with your dead lift, means that each individual has a genetically fixed potential to accelerate himself or an object, but the amount of weight which can be propelled through this fixed acceleration is trainable. If you are weak you can only throw a baseball as fast as you can. If you get really strong you can do it with a shot put.

    The acceleration remains the same but as the mass is increased through training, the power displayed increases proportionately.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,661

    Default

    Once again, clarity. The ability to accelerate is a function of how many motor units can be recruited in as short as possible a time. This is the fixed part. The trainable part is how much force those recruited motor units can apply during that short time interval. We know these things because we know that 1.) Standing Vertical Jump is a measure of the ability to instantly recruit motor units, that it does not improve significantly with training, and 2.) that an athlete with a 600-pound deadlift always cleans more than an athlete with a 200-pound deadlift. The power clean is basically there for practicing the rapid recruitment of force -- but it cannot develop either the recruitment ability or increase the amount of force on its own.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Portola Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,250

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    Once again, clarity. The ability to accelerate is a function of how many motor units can be recruited in as short as possible a time. This is the fixed part. The trainable part is how much force those recruited motor units can apply during that short time interval. We know these things because we know that 1.) Standing Vertical Jump is a measure of the ability to instantly recruit motor units, that it does not improve significantly with training, and 2.) that an athlete with a 600-pound deadlift always cleans more than an athlete with a 200-pound deadlift. The power clean is basically there for practicing the rapid recruitment of force -- but it cannot develop either the recruitment ability or increase the amount of force on its own.
    Yep. Makes sense. Thanks.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Western NY
    Posts
    3,047

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Uh oh Rip, you mentioned SVJ...

    That's akin to saying Beetleguese three times. You're gonna get the wacko birds showing up here.

    All that good work Been just produced will get lost in their wailings

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •