There is a lot of irony in your post.
My original question was, of course, sarcastic and facetious. .
By using sarcasm to discredit my question, you discredit exactly the logic that Bill Nye uses to imply that we are all "ignorant bigots" by not wanting to try "different flavors" of sexuality. It's simply science. "It is so much more than 'either or'.
Here's a nice cartoon to help educate you kids on the science of sexuality:
Ice Cream Sexuality - Bill Nye Saves The World - YouTube
And although it may not be your personal viewpoint, Bill Nye does represent the "widespread liberal viewpoint".
(Yes...I said "widespread" )
Of course it is possible on both accounts. I am just saying that perhaps the reason most people who dislike the idea are just a little bit worried that they would enjoy it.
And the reason why people -- such as myself -- are fags or faggots without being actually homosexuals is rather simple, we just don't lift that much. I have no problem being called a fag at this time. Heck, I'd not even have a problem being called gay, I can't even think of a situation where this would be somehow a problem for me. Perhaps, *perhaps* if I were to be in a situation where some silly asshole were to somehow exhibit some kind of anti-social behavior directed at homosexuals, but this is a rather remote possibility.
I forget what this was about. But I would like to remind you that we Finns do get naked with our colleagues and friends on a regular basis. Most Americans I've encountered have found the idea of getting naked and sitting uncomfortably close to one another in a hot enclosed space rather off-putting. Though, I don't recall ever encountering a situation where people would suck cocks on such occasions.