starting strength gym
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: How many layers of complete uninformed bullshit can you identify in this article?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,661

    Default How many layers of complete uninformed bullshit can you identify in this article?

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    299

    Default

    "...if you’ve never lifted a barbell and then start lifting 10kg, you’ll put your tissues at risk."

    FFS

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,661

    Default

    That one really stands out among the rest of this insane Journalism bullshit.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    728

    Default

    It's not like you'd expect much more from the Guardian.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    874

    Default

    "Van Dijk tells me she broke her hand doing box jumps last year" really just says it all. The images each say a thousand words, too. Running shoes instead of maybe a barbell or a weight plate, of which there are no images in the entire article; some instagram model showing off her lovely pearly whites; and a bunch of what appear to be detrained novices in entirely compromising positions. What's the bearded dude touching the girl's shoulder and back for? Doesn't he know the front of the upper torso is a more stable position to touch a female? He could knock her over! Why is the bald guy with the smug smile staring at the bearded dude like he thinks he realises him being up to no good? The black girl is giving the yoga lady the death stare for some unexplained reason while the other girl seems to be preoccupied with the hands or maybe the nails of the yoga lady, but why? And Mr. Widespread is just checking out yoga lady's ass, without a doubt. All of them are wearing running shoes, too, and it's making me even sicker than I already am. Someone pass me the plyo bucket so I can plyo vomit out my plyo insides.

    Finally, this would be an ok article if it was about the entirely vapid instagram popularity that goes with the incredibly edited and theatrical fitness industry that does thrive on selling bullshit to suckers. Sadly, it's supposed to be about "fitness" as a whole and so gets lost in the confusion from the very beginning. As I said, not a single image or mention of a barbell or even a weight plate; 10kg could be anything ranging from a kettlebell to the plyo box on which Miss Van Dijk broke her hand, a trick she'll have to teach the other fabulous (PTs) if they don't know how to perform it already. As it stands, the whole entirety of fitness is represented as being "something one attempts to achieve through spinning classes and being duped by smarter people only to find out they're the lowest of the low, thus leaving them to admire the genetic elite in perpetuity and concluding that all there efforts now and in the future are completely in vain". Give it the title "suckers will be suckers", add "fuck you" as the final line in an oversized, shiny font, and give it a better author. Those running shoes, man, goddamn.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Gunshine State
    Posts
    95

    Default

    The lede line sets the tone for the whole article by agonizing over the horrors of "unregulated instructors"? How would the hapless consumers determine if a person is competent without a certificate from the state?

    Maybe some of Rip's Euro-customers will drop by to explain that the Brits aren't really the bunch of sniveling ninnies the piece makes them out to be.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    598

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    That one really stands out among the rest of this insane Journalism bullshit.
    It's The Guardian, Mark. The gold standard for journalistic bullshit. To get a better idea, take a look at @SoMuchGuardian. Then you just might find this article to be sensible and well informed in comparison.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,661

    Default

    I see your point.

    But the NYT is not above this low standard: 110 Million Americans Have an S.T.D. - NYTimes.com

    The incidence of chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis is increasing, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. An estimated 110 million Americans now are infected with a sexually transmitted disease.
    One third of the entire population of the country has syphilis, gonorrhea, or chlamydia? This makes not the slightest bit of sense, if you think about it for more than about 5 seconds, yet here it is, presented as obvious fact in the nations "newspaper of record."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Curlrack, Germany
    Posts
    54

    Default

    After you've read the article, there are these links at the bottom. Amusing.

    screenshot-www.theguardian.com-2017-10-01-00-29-39.jpg

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    I stopped reading after this...

    Later this afternoon, she tells me, she is getting the symbol for Earth tattooed on her wrist because, “I’m a vegetarian for the planet.”

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •