starting strength gym
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 74

Thread: The Metric System

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    204

    Default

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    The Royale with Cheese.
    What about the Big Mac?

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,269

    Default

    The Imperial system is more human. An inch is about the width of the thumb of an average size man. A foot's about the length of one's foot (average size adult male).
    Similar with many other Imperial measurments.
    The numbers, though galling when adding/subtracting/multiplying/dividing feet with fractional inches are derived from and ingrained in our actual lives.
    The meter was originally defined in 1793 as one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole. [wikipedia]
    WTF does that have to do with anything we measure in our practical lives? It's the size of nothing useful/practical in our lives.

    I think the adoption and use of both systems, metric for scientific usage, and imperial for whatever else, is fine. Just don't mix them up.

    Then there is the widespread use in common parlance. As they said back in the 70's the metric system lost by a mile.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    255

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unruhschuh View Post
    Celsius is much more intuitive: At zero, water freezes, at 100 it boils (at 1 atm). Humans feel comfortable somewhere between the two (also at 1 atm).
    I'm a somewhat squishy metric fan, but I hate Celsius. The degrees are too big, so you need decimal places to distinguish differences between temparatures that humans can easily perceive (70F and 71F are just different enough that you might want to adjust the thermostat by one tick). Plus 0=really damn cold, and 100=really damn hot, so it's a good match to the range of temperatures humans normally live in.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    151

    Default

    There's two problems here.... first, the metric system is too French for most Americans to put up with. I mean, it's basically one step away from your wife not shaving her legs, god damn socialism. Secondly, it would take government regulations to make it work, and the average American will stick their hands directly into a campfire rather than obey a government rule about fire safety.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brodie Butland View Post
    Because then McDonald's will have to rename the Quarter Pounder.
    This is the most satisfying answer so far.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unruhschuh View Post
    What about Fahrenheit? The conversion goes like this:

    [°C] = ([°F] − 32) ×  5⁄9
    [°F] = [°C] ×  9⁄5 + 32

    Celsius is much more intuitive: At zero, water freezes, at 100 it boils (at 1 atm). Humans feel comfortable somewhere between the two (also at 1 atm).
    Celsius is too narrow of a scale. 0-100 in Fahrenheit is great for explaining how much the weather sucks today. Going past either of those numbers is universally understood as "the weather really, really sucks today".

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    The Royale with Cheese.
    The Newton Burger. 1 Newton = 0.225 lbs

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Uk
    Posts
    1,468

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    The Royale with Cheese.
    Classic :-)

    As for the metric system: The world chose gold and silver as money through the process of market trading. The operative word being 'chose' and not 'imposed'. The imperial system was also chosen by the market as representative of the best system. The metric system is an imposed system, a top down central Government committee lead decision forced on the population-often accompanied by fining/prison sentences for those refusing to comply.

    Now my countrymen have advocated to leave the EU, here's hoping we abandon the hated French/USSR/Nazi system of regulation and discover what's best.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,128

    Default

    It's good to be able to think in more than one measurement system, particularly for spatial visualization.

    Metric may be "easier" for some, but then you get the misplaced decimal point errors, particularly in those who only are fluent (or less, esp if also dependent on machines to do manipulate numbers for them) in one system.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    658

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    The Royale with Cheese.
    Check out the big brain on Mark!

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •