starting strength gym
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36

Thread: Cervical Radiculopathy - No Pain but Severe Weakness in Triceps and Lats (with video)

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,301

    Default

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    Quote Originally Posted by uxdale View Post
    Hi Mugaaz, your healing timeline is interesting, and I'm glad you were able to bounce back twice. In the 3 month period, did you seek non-operative treatment like physical therapy, massage therapy, etc?
    I tried a couple chiropractors, but I couldn't find anyone except complete quacks. They'd try to insist on e-stim and other "modalities" other than adjustment. They seemed obviously reluctant to adjust or try anything with radiculopathy. I understood why, but if so then what is the point of their service. I suspect there are good chiros out there, but I couldn't find any.

    I tried massage, and got some minor pain relief for 24-48 hours. The effect was minor and temporary, so I didn't continue it after a couple sessions.

    I started using a cervical traction unit within a couple days. It was *very* effective for 7-10 days after the first injury. I didn't feel much after that time period, but continued using it multiple times daily for 4 weeks. The second time I got injured, the traction unit didn't noticeably help.

    They scheduled me for PT, but I didn't see the point. I was able to squat and bench without worsening the symptoms any. I was benching around 250x5x5 before the injury, but failed the first rep of a warmup at 165 the week after. I had to "re-learn" how to bench because I had lost so much strength in my right arm. I had constant issues with keeping the bar horizontal without my torso starting to rotate under it. I could deadlift, but it was worsening the radiculopathy, so I held off for 6-8 weeks. When I was able to deadlift without worsening the symptoms I started training it again.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,927

    Default

    Any experience with the difference between a hospital MRI and storefront MRI?

    It is said that hospitals have stronger magnets and better trained staff which both imply higher resolution over the latter.

    The other notable difference is cost. A hospital MRI can cost upwards of $3K, while a storefront/walking might cost less than $1K.

    So it can be a trade between accuracy and cost.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,669

    Default

    I don't know that your assumptions are true, at all. Why would you assume that a small-group-owned facility is equipped with an older shittier machine/radiologist?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    I don't know that your assumptions are true, at all. Why would you assume that a small-group-owned facility is equipped with an older shittier machine/radiologist?
    Sure. But it's not my assumption. The CEO of an orthopedic firm told me this. He did not seem to have a vested interest, since the imaging would not happen at his firm, but at an independent hospital.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,669

    Default

    We'll have to wait for another opinion, especially considering the fact that his firm may shop all their MRIs to the independent hospital.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    We'll have to wait for another opinion, especially considering the fact that his firm may shop all their MRIs to the independent hospital.

    Another data point. I brought this MRI issue up with a colleague whose doctor also told him that resolution/skills at the imaging clinics are lower than at the hospitals.

    Anyway, I'm listening.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Philly burbs, USA
    Posts
    653

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VNV View Post
    Another data point. I brought this MRI issue up with a colleague whose doctor also told him that resolution/skills at the imaging clinics are lower than at the hospitals.

    Anyway, I'm listening.
    You guys know that many of those off-premise imaging centers are owned by Ortho providers with privileges at the nearby facilities? In the HMO days (before high-deductible plans) the imaging shops were a way to capture revenue by sending the practice’s patients. Now that there’s competition, they have cost advantages.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, CA
    Posts
    547

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    If you need the surgery, it's because things will not heal, so get it NOW.
    Correct answer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    I don't know that your assumptions are true, at all. Why would you assume that a small-group-owned facility is equipped with an older shittier machine/radiologist?
    Correct question.

    Hospitals have tremendous overhead expenses that stand-alone imaging centers don’t have. They also depend on their “name” in the community to drive sales. Stand-alones have only their quality and their technology to compete with.

    I’ve had private imaging centers market to me my whole career in medicine. They always tout having the most modern and up to date equipment (facts that are easily verifiable). Hospitals have many constraints that make them less likely to upgrade equipment (and less incentive given their reliance on reputation within their community).

    This would also apply to the quality of the radiologists as well. However, the surgeon’s reading is usually more important anyway because they rely on the actual images more than on the radiologist’s reading to guide decision-making.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,669

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JFord View Post
    This would also apply to the quality of the radiologists as well. However, the surgeon’s reading is usually more important anyway because they rely on the actual images more than on the radiologist’s reading to guide decision-making.
    Absolutely. If your surgeon doesn't read your MRI/relies on the radiologist, I recommend that you get up and leave.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,927

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by JFord View Post
    Correct answer.



    Correct question.

    Hospitals have tremendous overhead expenses that stand-alone imaging centers don’t have. They also depend on their “name” in the community to drive sales. Stand-alones have only their quality and their technology to compete with.

    I’ve had private imaging centers market to me my whole career in medicine. They always tout having the most modern and up to date equipment (facts that are easily verifiable). Hospitals have many constraints that make them less likely to upgrade equipment (and less incentive given their reliance on reputation within their community).

    This would also apply to the quality of the radiologists as well. However, the surgeon’s reading is usually more important anyway because they rely on the actual images more than on the radiologist’s reading to guide decision-making.
    This is helpful.

    The surgeon told me he'd be reading the images himself. He did ask for a "closed" MRI instead of an "open" one. Otherwise, according to his front desk, private imaging centers were acceptable.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •