I hope you back everything up on hard drives and then bury them somewhere safe. At the rate that things are happening we are going to need to do what ever we can to safeguard and chronicle history prior to this year.
Printable View
You're quite right, Gil. Thanks for the reminder.
And now they decide to publish an update on cycle threshold.
WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05
Kevin McKernan
Lets discuss the WHO release...
This is the anniversary of the WHO populating
their web site with the Drosten test that
caused many of these problems.
Document penned on Jan 13th but released
during Biden's inauguration on the Jan 20th.
Oddly, the WHO asks users to read the IFUs
to scrutinize the proper Ct to use.
But alas, the CD protocol has no guidance
here and you are back to finger pointing
accountability.
Maybe the WHO shouldn't have such
protocols on their website?
Particularly when the WHO protocols point to
NCBI accession numbers that don't contain
the E gene they claim can be amplified from
such sequences??
Note these sequences only contain RdRp?
How do E genes amplify such samples?
https://twitter.com/Kevin_McKernan/s...198991877?s=19
For people who are interested check out the link to his thread. He had some links to PDFs and pictures that I couldn't figure out how to put them here.
So, how about Biden's 17 executive orders?
Personally, I find the "ethics rules" to be the most ominous one, although I haven't been able to find what those rules are yet.
Listen here you little hunchbacked, fat assed, bald headed, red faced, two faced, limp dicked, long balled, hard nipped, closed minded, science denying, yes-man collecting, milk drinking, squash burning, mispronouncing, has been, sexagenarian greaseball bitch! It's a wonder you haven't broken your arm jerking yourself off. If anyone is sucking your impotent pecker it's the self-proclaimed MPBITEU and "one true voice in the strength and conditioning profession" who conveniently silences, bans, or censors any dissident voice and surrounds himself with equally chickenshit or plain stupid men who never challenge any of his ideas. Those that do are always shown the door because you can't handle the thought of others smarter than you. This FEAR of inferiority and not always being right is why the only thing you've thought long and hard about in the last 40 years relates directly to your job despite regurgitating "specialization is for insects." You extoll the virtues of obtaining the education of a hard science degree but once someone uses the skills cultivated in such a pursuit to promulgate a fact-based understanding of the world that doesn't fit your preconceived notions you reject it in the absence of evidence to the contrary, and a fuckton of evidence to back it up. You succumb to the genetic fallacy so that you may dismiss ideas of anyone you disagree with as lies because you're too lazy and scared of changing your mind to evaluate the claims put forth themselves. When the facts support your point of view you use them to refute a claim, but when they don't, you dismiss the claim anyway and take the easy way out by making ad hominem attacks or deleting posts entirely. What a miserable old pussy. It's clear your won't do Rogan because you're too much of a coward to have someone actually challenge your ideas to any degree whatsoever. Hundreds of thousands mourned the passing of coach Pendlay, because he was offering advice online until the day he died instead of constantly belittling those who saw a Q&A as a chance to learn from an expert, but the same won't be true for the insular shitstain that is you. Fuck you and your monkey!
Sorry Rip, this data is not correct. Unless the CDC are lying, there were roughly 3.25 million deaths in 2020 in the US. Out of a population of 330 million it is approximately 9.8 death per 1000. It doesn't mean that all the excess is due to Covid, but it certainly exists.
Alright, George, I'll bite.
The issue with what Gilead posted, as I'm sure quite a few people noted but you somehow missed in your zealous white knighting, was that it's your typical scare tactic, clickbait headline. The statement, although probably factual, suggests a casual relationship between the deaths and the vaccination. You know, just like a headline that read " man has died after being shot". Any reasonable human being would assume that he died as a result of being shot. How surprised would you be, if you were to read the rest of the article, to learn that he died from drowning when the ambulance transporting him fell off a bridge and into a river? The headline wouldn't make much sense then, would it?
There's a similar situation in Norway, and since that data is easily retrievable, I'll toss it out here. 33 people, who currently live in nursing homes and fall into the 75+ age bracket, died shortly after being vaccinated for Covid 19. Sounds fishy, right? Except 45 people in that particular demographic die every single day regardless of their vaccination status. Seems a little less fishy now, yeah?
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
Is it worth investigating? Sure. Does it mean those scare tactic, clickbait headlines any less annoying? Nope.
In the future, if you're going to play, you should probably check and make sure you're not showing up to a major league game with a Triple-A team.