COVID19 Factors We Should Consider/Current Events COVID19 Factors We Should Consider/Current Events - Page 1398

starting strength gym
Page 1398 of 1599 FirstFirst ... 39889812981348138813961397139813991400140814481498 ... LastLast
Results 13,971 to 13,980 of 15983

Thread: COVID19 Factors We Should Consider/Current Events

  1. #13971
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Garage of GainzZz
    Posts
    2,609

    Default

    • starting strength seminar october 2021
    • starting strength seminar december 2021
    • starting strength seminar february 2022
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitsuma View Post
    Dr Pierre Kory: "It's a crime what they are doing to the world" - buried in this interview, Dr Kory explains how he figured out how to treat covid. "there's this amazing device called a telephone". He called his peers at hospitals in NYC and other hotspots, and they brainstormed. Again, another professional who can't help himself; he's gotta figure shit out even though it will end his career or even cause his home to be raided by the FBI (as with Simone Gold).
    I said this months ago. This is how doctors used to operate, i.e., just like how engineers (also used to) solve problems.

  2. #13972
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,203

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jenni View Post
    I think this concept is under-rated. It doesn't matter how smart you are or how high your IQ is if you can't see the patterns. People aren't just gonna label shit for you and be honest. One has to recognize the patterns and be able to label it themselves. Don't forget past orthodoxies.
    Just be careful. Pattern recognition has been deemed racist and sexist and is now strongly discouraged by The Party.

  3. #13973
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    46,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Grantham View Post
    I think this is an artifact of reporting preliminary results. Most of the participants who got vaccinated early in their pregnancy don't have a completed pregnancy yet, so they are not included in the data. If someone was vaccinated early in their pregnancy between December and February, the only way they would be included in these data would be if they've had a miscarriage or early-term birth. Because of that, the only result available for most of the people vaccinated early will be an adverse outcome
    What's wrong with this one? Myocarditis Following Immunization With mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Members of the US Military | JAMA Cardiology | JAMA Network

  4. #13974
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    311

    Default

    I never paid attention to this until now, but this Cosby things sounds like a yet another mess of corrupt politicians, witnesses, accusers, and judges.

    THE COSBY REBUTTAL
    The Cosby Rebuttal

  5. #13975
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    801

    Default

    This man is brilliant.
    LIVE FROM ‘EVENT 2021’ IN DALLAS, TX - The Highwire
    It's a long watch so here are the notes to see if it is worth your while. https://21a86421-c3e0-461b-83c2-cfe4...749262f4b4.pdf
    About Dr. Fleming | Fleming-Method

  6. #13976
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    St. Joseph, MO
    Posts
    369

    Default

    I don't know of anything wrong with that one.

  7. #13977

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    And it's not like this wasn't obvious to anybody who thought about it for more than 5 seconds. CO2 is apparently only a problem in the atmosphere.
    Considering the relatively small volume inside a mask, I honestly wouldn't have expected quite so high numbers. Especially for 17 year old boys. If anything, I suppose this proves beyond reasonable doubt that masks "work".

    Here's the full study, short and sweet: Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Pediatrics | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network

    Here's the wikipedia page of the guy who did the statistical analysis. I'll be expecting this to get defaced once the study gets more views. Harald Walach - Wikipedia

  8. #13978
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    801

    Default

    IJERPH | Free Full-Text | Is a Mask That Covers the Mouth and Nose Free from Undesirable Side Effects in Everyday Use and Free of Potential Hazards? | HTML
    6. Conclusions
    On the one hand, the advocacy of an extended mask requirement remains predominantly theoretical and can only be sustained with individual case reports, plausibility arguments based on model calculations and promising in vitro laboratory tests. Moreover, recent studies on SARS-CoV-2 show both a significantly lower infectivity [175] and a significantly lower case mortality than previously assumed, as it could be calculated that the median corrected infection fatality rate (IFR) was 0.10% in locations with a lower than average global COVID-19 population mortality rate [176]. In early October 2020, the WHO also publicly announced that projections show COVID-19 to be fatal for approximately 0.14% of those who become ill—compared to 0.10% for endemic influenza—again a figure far lower than expected [177].
    On the other hand, the side effects of masks are clinically relevant.
    In our work, we focused exclusively on the undesirable and negative side effects that can be produced by masks. Valid significant evidence of combined mask-related changes were objectified (p < 0.05, n ≥ 50%), and we found a clustered and common occurrence of the different adverse effects within the respective studies with significantly measured effects (Figure 2). We were able to demonstrate a statistically significant correlation of the observed adverse effect of hypoxia and the symptom of fatigue with p < 0.05 in the quantitative evaluation of the primary studies. Our review of the literature shows that both healthy and sick people can experience Mask-Induced Exhaustion Syndrome (MIES), with typical changes and symptoms that are often observed in combination, such as an increase in breathing dead space volume [22,24,58,59], increase in breathing resistance [31,35,60,61], increase in blood carbon dioxide [13,15,17,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,35], decrease in blood oxygen saturation [18,19,21,23,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], increase in heart rate [23,29,30,35], increase in blood pressure [25,35], decrease in cardiopulmonary capacity [31], increase in respiratory rate [15,21,23,34,36], shortness of breath and difficulty breathing [15,17,19,21,23,25,29,31,34,35,60,71,85,101,133], headache [19,27,29,37,66,67,68,71,83], dizziness [23,29], feeling hot and clammy [17,22,29,31,35,44,71,85,133], decreased ability to concentrate [29], decreased ability to think [36,37], drowsiness [19,29,32,36,37], decrease in empathy perception [99], impaired skin barrier function [37,72,73] with itching [31,35,67,71,72,73,91,92,93], acne, skin lesions and irritation [37,72,73], overall perceived fatigue and exhaustion [15,19,21,29,31,32,34,35,69] (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).
    Wearing masks does not consistently cause clinical deviations from the norm of physiological parameters, but according to the scientific literature, a long-term pathological consequence with clinical relevance is to be expected owing to a longer-lasting effect with a subliminal impact and significant shift in the pathological direction. For changes that do not exceed normal values, but are persistently recurring, such as an increase in blood carbon dioxide [38,160], an increase in heart rate [55] or an increase in respiratory rate [56,57], which have been documented while wearing a mask [13,15,17,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,34,35] (Figure 2), a long-term generation of high blood pressure [25,35], arteriosclerosis and coronary heart disease and of neurological diseases is scientifically obvious [38,55,56,57,160]. This pathogenetic damage principle with a chronic low-dose exposure with long-term effect, which leads to disease or disease-relevant conditions, has already been extensively studied and described in many areas of environmental medicine [38,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Extended mask-wearing would have the potential, according to the facts and correlations we have found, to cause a chronic sympathetic stress response induced by blood gas modifications and controlled by brain centers. This in turn induces and triggers immune suppression and metabolic syndrome with cardiovascular and neurological diseases.
    We not only found evidence in the reviewed mask literature of potential long-term effects, but also evidence of an increase in direct short-term effects with increased mask-wearing time in terms of cumulative effects for: carbon dioxide retention, drowsiness, headache, feeling of exhaustion, skin irritation (redness, itching) and microbiological contamination (germ colonization) [19,22,37,66,68,69,89,91,92].
    Overall, the exact frequency of the described symptom constellation MIES in the mask-using populace remains unclear and cannot be estimated due to insufficient data.
    Theoretically, the mask-induced effects of the drop in blood gas oxygen and increase in carbon dioxide extend to the cellular level with induction of the transcription factor HIF (hypoxia-induced factor) and increased inflammatory and cancer-promoting effects [160] and can, thus, also have a negative influence on pre-existing clinical pictures.
    In any case, the MIES potentially triggered by masks (Figure 3 and Figure 4) contrasts with the WHO definition of health: “health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.” [178].
    All the scientific facts found in our work expand the knowledge base for a differentiated view of the mask debate. This gain can be relevant for decision makers who have to deal with the issue of mandatory mask use during the pandemic under constant review of proportionality as well as for physicians who can advise their patients more appropriately on this basis. For certain diseases, taking into account the literature found in this study, it is also necessary for the attending physician to weigh up the benefits and risks with regard to a mask obligation. With an overall strictly scientific consideration, a recommendation for mask exemption can become justifiable within the framework of a medical appraisal (Figure 5).
    (Ijerph 18 04344 g005 550Figure 5. Diseases/predispositions with significant risks, according to the literature found, when using masks. Indications for weighing up medical mask exemption certificates.)
    In addition to protecting the health of their patients, doctors should also base their actions on the guiding principle of the 1948 Geneva Declaration, as revised in 2017. According to this, every doctor vows to put the health and dignity of his patient first and, even under threat, not to use his medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties [9]. Within the framework of these findings, we, therefore, propagate an explicitly medically judicious, legally compliant action in consideration of scientific factual reality [2,4,5,16,130,132,143,175,176,177] against a predominantly assumption-led claim to a general effectiveness of masks, always taking into account possible unwanted individual effects for the patient and mask wearer concerned, entirely in accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine and the ethical guidelines of a physician.
    The results of the present literature review could help to include mask-wearing in the differential diagnostic pathophysiological cause consideration of every physician when corresponding symptoms are present (MIES, Figure 4). In this way, the physician can draw on an initial complaints catalogue that may be associated with mask-wearing (Figure 2) and also exclude certain diseases from the general mask requirement (Figure 5).
    For scientists, the prospect of continued mask use in everyday life suggests areas for further research. In our view, further research is particularly desirable in the gynecological (fetal and embryonic) and pediatric fields, as children are a vulnerable group that would face the longest and, thus, most profound consequences of a potentially risky mask use. Basic research at the cellular level regarding mask-induced triggering of the transcription factor HIF with potential promotion of immunosuppression and carcinogenicity also appears to be useful under this circumstance. Our scoping review shows the need for a systematic review.
    The described mask-related changes in respiratory physiology can have an adverse effect on the wearer’s blood gases sub-clinically and in some cases also clinically manifest and, therefore, have a negative effect on the basis of all aerobic life, external and internal respiration, with an influence on a wide variety of organ systems and metabolic processes with physical, psychological and social consequences for the individual human being.

  9. #13979
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    801

  10. #13980
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    737

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by cmdrfunk View Post
    I never paid attention to this until now, but this Cosby things sounds like a yet another mess of corrupt politicians, witnesses, accusers, and judges.

    THE COSBY REBUTTAL
    The Cosby Rebuttal
    The Cosby thing always seemed fishy to me, but l never cared enough to investigate.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •