Build Back Better, and the New Normal could be code for Year One Millenarianism and Jacobinism, and thermally doing a good job on their new Secular Religion and New Puritanism.
Secular Religion and the New Puritanism | Art of Manliness
This is discussed in this quite interesting interview.
Meeting of the COVID-19 Giants with Geert Vanden Bossche and Robert Malone MD | Vejon Health
Build Back Better, and the New Normal could be code for Year One Millenarianism and Jacobinism, and thermally doing a good job on their new Secular Religion and New Puritanism.
Secular Religion and the New Puritanism | Art of Manliness
COVID-19 mortality risk correlates inversely with vitamin D3 status, and a mortality rate close to zero could theoretically be achieved at 50 ng/ml 25(OH)D3: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis | medRxiv
https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2...84acf8069a.pdf
If Vaccine Adverse Events Tracking Systems Do Not Support Causal Inference, then “Pharmacovigilance” Does Not Exist
There are two messages from those who hold appointed offices or other influential positions in Public Health on long-term vaccine safety.
The first message is that long-term randomized double blinded placebo-controlled clinical trials are not necessary for the long-term study of vaccine safety because we have “pharmacovigilance”; i.e. longterm post-market safety surveillance that is supported by widely accessible, passive vaccine adverse events tracking systems.
The second message is that any use of those very same vaccine adverse events tracking systems that leads to the inference or conclusion that vaccines might cause serious adverse events or death is unsupported by such systems.
So which is it?
A Florida Man is a Free Man.
He's far from perfect, and will undoubtedly fuck us at some point, but, man oh man, DeSantis.
Imagine after 18 months of utter failure by every metric which is plain to the average person that you chalk it up to "adherence to ideology."
Don't battle; you'll lose.
The evil on display here is almost incomprehensible: Amazon.com
This is also important, with little Greta Thunberg running around:
Science is not the best argument that can explain the data; it’s the process of approaching the truth asymptotically, with ever increasing accuracy, by getting rid of possibilities that do not survive bona fide critical tests.
People love a good anecdote -- when it aligns with their own bias.
One might look at a story like this where someone catches covid a second time and has such a severe case and wonder just how "healthy" the dude's immune system was, to begin with. Maybe he was just terribly unlucky. Anyways, exceptions don't invalidate the rule.