I don't think this is as damning as it looks on the surface. Without normalizing for doses administered or at least lot size, it's possible that this is a random output. Unfortunately the CDC guards those numbers through a registration process.
Printable View
This is very interesting:
This is becoming more widely known. But it will never appear in the party media.Quote:
She added that during her time at Ventavia the company expected a federal audit but this never came.
From: Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial | The BMJ Read it. Tell your sister-in-law.Quote:
In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open letter to the billions of people around the world who were investing their hopes in a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine to end the pandemic. “As I’ve said before, we are operating at the speed of science,” Bourla wrote, explaining to the public when they could expect a Pfizer vaccine to be authorised in the United States.1
But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.
Nobody can believe that the incompetent bastards didn't successfully rig the election. I don't believe it. They will find some ballots today, just watch. A Ryder truck will pull up to a courthouse any second now. Keep us posted.
And look at this shit: Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
Apparently Bloomberg has forgotten their propaganda mission, and will be soon destroyed. But look at the bizarre statement by the co-leader of the study:
He makes no more logical sense than Joe Brandon, and most people will just nod in agreement, just to get along with everybody else nodding in agreement. A post-truth society, that's where we live in 2021. Be sure to watch this Friday's podcast with Karl Denninger about this phenomenon.Quote:
“Our findings show that vaccination alone is not enough to prevent people from being infected with the delta variant and spreading it in household settings,” said Ajit Lalvani, a professor of infectious diseases at Imperial College London who co-led the study. “The ongoing transmission we are seeing between vaccinated people makes it essential for unvaccinated people to get vaccinated to protect themselves.”
Do you two really believe that some lots are 100x the size of other lots?
Or "bad" lots only had 10% of the shots administered?
^^ THIS. ^^
Data falsification happens in every industry. The more money involved, the higher the likelihood.
This is why he was allowed to win. It's a pressure release valve. He might slightly decelerate the free-fall into oblivion, but like all the professional losers before him, he isn't going to fundamentally change a thing. Trump maybe kinda might have, but this guy certainly won't.
Attachment 7851
I think it's entirely possible (assuming you misspoke in your second question) There's a reason that there's a specific process to get the lot sizes from the CDC (not allowed for us little people). Additionally if you sort normally distributed data from highest to lowest, it would always show a similar shape to what Karl's showing. I'm a big fan of Karl but the data isn't available to draw any conclusions here.
Maybe someone familiar with pharmaceutical production will chime in on what factors into lot size, as my expertise is only in math, not pharmaceuticals.
I've been using Wiki as a tool to find possible movies and books on the Internet Archive. Came across this while looking at post-apocalyptic fiction and I had to laugh: “Survivers-a British post-apocalyptic fiction drama television series that broadcast from 1975 to 1977. It concerns the plight of a group of people who have survived an apocalyptic plague pandemic, which was accidentally released by a Chinese scientist and quickly spread across the world via air travel.”
I absolutely agree with Kitsuma's quote, and your point about data falsification. However, without more information about the production and distribution of the lots, yes I can believe some lots could be 100 x others and "bad" (I think you mean same quality, as variances in quality, or poisoning, is the hypothesis) lots only had 10% administered. A large, or small, lot could be distributed to an area where no one wants the jab. Lot sizes can be based on production facilities capabilities, technicians schedules, and many other factors.
As I said before, I don't doubt that poisoning could be the case. Or, preferably distribution of placebos, so I still have hopes that members of my family that took the injection might not suffer any adverse health effects. He has definitely made the case that it should be looked at. But, I'd need more information about the lot sizes before agreeing that a good case was made showing poisoning of specific lots. If someone can provide information to estimate lot size mins, maxes, and means, then this might help.