The speaker in that video turns up at most of our anti-mandate rallies and rambles on about 'corporate agents' running governments and the paedo rings at the highest ranks of gov. Some of what he says is probably true, but it's a distraction from the immediate challenge we have, that being people are losing lives and jobs and no long-term court challenges against an entrenched plutocratic system is going to help that.
The Aboriginal population of Australia is somewhere around 2% of the total population (roughly 20% of the Northern Territory population where he and I live). They could succeed in the High Court and it wouldn't make a lick of difference because the Feds would simply find a way to make the decision irrelevant. They'd be voted out, if they didn't because the greater majority wouldn't stand for it. Of course the media would go all in on the 'Aboriginals can claim your house and land' stories, like they have in the past.
I played on the same football team as the speaker in the early 90s and he's a nice fella and means well. Since then, he's found a cause and all power to him for that. But this thing that is happening a lot lately, where people try to find little inconsistencies in the laws and the health directions and think it will be the key to the whole mess falling in a heap, is missing the wider point (of endemic corruption) and wasting time when the national and state governments are simply changing the rules whenever they like.
Re Mark's comment "Will there be a "2nd Amendment" in this new nation?"...I'm not sure how common it is these days, but Aboriginal tribes (at least in the recent past) typically
conducted 'payback' punishments to perpetrators of crimes in their community. Do something really bad, you get speared as payback.