COVID19 Factors We Should Consider/Current Events

[Jovan Dragisic]

Agreed, dropping it.

[mkm5]

Let's juxtaposition two things, shall we?

Friday night in Minneapolis: Inside the bizarre hellworld of Minneapolis | Power Line



Twitter communications from a former assistant secretary of homeland security for President Barack Obama://nypost.com/2022/02/12/juliette-kayyem-walks-back-incendiary-freedom-convoy-tweets/



__________________________________________________ ______________________

And now would be an excellent time for a war: Have Real Wages Gone Up or Down Since Joe Biden Took Office?

__________________________________________________ _______________________



You guys going back and forth with Barry on this "inside baseball" shit are making very little sense to the rest of us who lost the train of thought dozens of pages ago. Either explain what you mean, or drop it, please.

According to the Sunday morning fear porn state media, Russia is preparing a false flag event in Ukraine next week to kick off WW3. Although they previously stated false flags are a conspiracy theory, but only in the US, apparently.

Looks like a seamless transition from an end of the world virus, to an end of the world climate crisis and more bankster's wars to finish things off.

Do you think they saved time for a victory lap on how the Dems solved the coof crisis? Or just straight to war it is?

[IlPrincipeBrutto]

I am putting this here for lack of a better place, and because it's about CoVid anyway.
I am half-way through reading A Plague Upon Our House by Dr. Scott Atlas, and there are a three things that stand out so far.

One, is that the Trump administration seemed to have had a lot of half-calibre figures in key places; President Trump himself seemed to be unaware of how inadequate some of his inner circle was, a weakness that allowed clearly conflicting messages to put out during the first months of the pandemic. And the President's message was not the one winning the argument.

The second, even more interesting feature of the book, is that most of the CoVid Task Force policy and decisions was driven by ... Deborah Birx.
Now, I must confess I had never heard of her name until I opened the book.
I did a quick search on this forum; there are 10 references to her, compared to 211 to Fauci.
Dr. Atlas is relentless in his criticism of Birx, and in making her carrying the Task Force proceedings almost single-handedly.
And yet, she seems to have kept a very low profile, most of the public attention having been captured by Fauci. I find this remarkable.

Third, and last, the book is quite captivating and interesting, but I think it's undermined by the total lack of any notes or references. As in, zero of either. It's a very bizarre choice, especially for an author who is clearly very used to work with scientific papers.

A good read, which I think is going to spring a few surprises for people on both sides of the political spectrum.

IPB

[Yngvi]

What do you call it when "French police" who aren't really French at all pull their guns on Frenchmen for flying the French flag?

George Soros calls it "open societies"
The legacy media calls it "cultural enrichment"

The French people are cowards if they can't recognize it as an overt act of war.

[Mark Rippetoe]

We've probably ignored this too long: Maria Bartiromo Unleashes — I was right all along about Hillary Clinton’s crimes… – CITIZEN FREE PRESS

I tend to ignore it because I know that nothing will ever happen to Hillary, justice-wise.

[VNV]

I am putting this here for lack of a better place, and because it's about CoVid anyway.
I am half-way through reading A Plague Upon Our House by Dr. Scott Atlas, and there are a three things that stand out so far.

One, is that the Trump administration seemed to have had a lot of half-calibre figures in key places; President Trump himself seemed to be unaware of how inadequate some of his inner circle was, a weakness that allowed clearly conflicting messages to put out during the first months of the pandemic. And the President's message was not the one winning the argument.

The second, even more interesting feature of the book, is that most of the CoVid Task Force policy and decisions was driven by ... Deborah Birx.
Now, I must confess I had never heard of her name until I opened the book.
I did a quick search on this forum; there are 10 references to her, compared to 211 to Fauci.
Dr. Atlas is relentless in his criticism of Birx, and in making her carrying the Task Force proceedings almost single-handedly.
And yet, she seems to have kept a very low profile, most of the public attention having been captured by Fauci. I find this remarkable.

Third, and last, the book is quite captivating and interesting, but I think it's undermined by the total lack of any notes or references. As in, zero of either. It's a very bizarre choice, especially for an author who is clearly very used to work with scientific papers.

A good read, which I think is going to spring a few surprises for people on both sides of the political spectrum.

IPB

I'm about to finish it. (See my earlier post on this.)

I am not surprised about Birx. I saw her on the podium early in the fiasco. I am surprised that she was almost the driving ego.

The real driving personality was . . . Pence. He seems to have been the consummate administrator. Pence could've cut Birx's ego in half, but he just stepped back and let it play out. "Iron sharpens iron." Doesn't apply when the knife is surrounded by limp dicks.

[OldDog]

RCMP vandalize private property at Coutts.

RCMP media representatives have confirmed that they were behind the damage.

[Gilead]

Pfizer pulls small child emergency use request after AFLDS spotlights vaccine trial failure | America'''s Frontline Doctors

[Ads]

Dr Kendrick's latest.

He links to a paper toward the end of his post - ‘Pathogenesis of COVID-19 described through the lens of an undersulfated and degraded epithelial and endothelial glycocalyx

Which he summarises as follows:

"This paper represents a monstrously complex discussion of ‘the terrain.’ Namely, why do some people shrug off COVID19, whereas others may become so seriously ill that they may die?

According to this paper, it has nothing whatsoever to do with the things that we think of as part of the classic ‘immune response.’ T-cells, B-cells, cytokines, antibodies and suchlike. It is almost entirely to do with the ability of cells in our body to prevent viral entry.

Keeping things as simple as possible. If COVID19 (or other viruses) cannot get into an endothelial cell – or find it very difficult to do so – because the glycocalyx is healthy and robust, then SARS-Cov2 simply bounces off, and you will not become seriously ‘infected’. Yes, you will ‘shrug’ the virus off. It may enter your bloodstream, but that is about as far as it is going to get.

I mean, I have always been aware of the importance of cell entry in viral diseases. Both HIV and the Ebola virus enter a cell by hijacking a protein called CCR5 attached to cell membranes. There are a few people who have a thing called the CCR5delta32 mutation. If you have this mutation, it means that HIV and Ebola cannot attach themselves to the protein. Neither virus can then get into the cell and ‘infection’ cannot occur. The terrain is all.

Have any of those on SAGE, or Fauci, or Ferguson, or the CDC paid any heed to such things? I would be very surprised if any of them had even heard of the glycocalyx. A perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger* effect, I feel."

[3rdcoast_slope]

Market-Ticker-Nad - The Market Ticker

California was partying and looting, but kids need to wear the mask. This is sickest and stupidest times in my lifetime. I cannot believe the harm they caused for their own self-interest. Disgusting to the core, I will never ever let them forget.