Email from Berenson states ivermectin not adequate for covid.. Link to article here:
Efficacy of Ivermectin Treatment on Disease Progression Among Adults With Mild to Moderate COVID-19 and Comorbidities: The I-TECH Randomized Clinical Trial | Critical Care Medicine | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network
Copy of his email #1 text....
Ivermectin fails
Alex Berenson Feb 18
A well-designed randomized controlled trial out of Malaysia showed it actually increased the risk of progression to severe Covid by 25% (the results were not statistically significant).
Sorry, folks. There are no magic bullets. (At least it doesn’t cause myocarditis.)
Someone tell Dr. Robert Malone.
.....
Copy from Berenson email #2
To the ivermectin fanatics
Alex Berenson Feb 19
You know what you sound like?
You sound like Tony Fauci trying to explain why a fourth shot of mRNA is gonna be magic when the first three have failed.
<picture of Fauci headline didn't come through>
Just stop, okay? One good randomized trial is worth 100 observational studies, and this was a good randomized trial. It set a reasonable endpoint and it missed. It didn’t just miss, it trended negative. So the secondary endpoints don’t mean squat.
And I don’t want to hear about how the ivermectin was given in a capsule when it should have been a tablet, or it was handed out at 9 a.m. when it should have been 9:15, or whatever. Just stop. If the drug works, it’ll work even if the dosing schedule isn’t exactly what you think it should be.
And I don’t want to hear about how ivermectin’s safe. You’re right. It is pretty safe. Celery is pretty safe too, but it doesn’t cure Covid either. We should give people medicines that work, not medicines that we wish would work.
You want to unsubscribe and listen to someone who will tell you what you want to hear? Be my guest. You’ve got lots of options. I promised myself a while back I was going to write what I thought was true even if it annoyed you.
I’m sticking to that.
.......