Originally Posted by
Sainame
They are not enforcing "compliance", they are enforcing what they deem to be best practice for reducing risks of the surgery. If you don't like how this medical group practices medicine, go somewhere else. Yes, the fears of the surgeon may be financially related, but the father doesn't get to place someone else's livelihood at risk. I laid out several options the family has, 2/3 of which do not require him to receive the vaccine. Wal is correct when he is disgusted by the actions of his father for the situation. There appear to be a lot of fake tears being shed on the behalf of this boy, but yet many people on here refuse to accept that the father bears the blame for placing his son's life at risk. And yes, I referred to your tears as fake because you seem far more interested in using this boy as a political prop to enforce your dogmatic beliefs regarding the vaccination. How fucked in the head are you?