Quote:
So the question rapidly becomes this: Is this drug, taken once in a while, exerting a downward regulatory pressure on cancer development such as to reduce the incidence of that out-of-control spiral -- and if so how does the benefit of that downward pressure compare with any potential negative long-term side effects?
We're not talking about taking this stuff all the time; they don't do that in Africa. Instead it is an every-few-months prophylaxis that is intended to nip any latent parasitic infections in the bud before they turn into medical disasters.
Again: Is that why none of those 31 nations are in the top 50 for cancer?
We don't know -- and the reason we don't know is that we haven't looked.
Wonder why we haven't looked? Might it have something to do with the money? Ah, such bitter cynicism we have learned over the past 2 years.
Quote:
If you look at the US Medical System through the lens of rape the people for as much money as you can get as its first, foremost and in fact at the managerial level the only goal, with all other outcomes secondary (and, by the way, how else can you look at it given what you've seen in the last two years with deliberate refusal to prescribe and use anything until you're choking to death) then the wild-eyed, rabid attack on Ivermectin in the context of Covid-19 makes perfect sense.
And before you try to claim that's not the overwhelming and only goal then defend the fact that Remdesivir, which was found worthless in a large international trial was the largest single drug expenditure in US hospitals in all of 2021. Oh, it has a record of killing people by destroying their kidneys as well, a record we knew prior to Covid because it was tried against Ebola and failed.