Originally Posted by
francesco.decaro
I'll just share my naive opinion about this guy.
Why is anyone still wasting their time with this guy? I've read the discussion. It's pointless, he keeps covering his ass and not share any opinion or data worth anything. Whenever you put him in a corner he comes up with "I don't know", "probably", "possibly", which I guess to him is a sign of humility and intelligence, but smells like BS to me.
He talks about "guidance" when referring to the coercion young people suffered about getting vaccinated, and still remains ambiguous when considering if it should be done now, and I guess lockdowns/masks/denied visits/denied travel/closure of businesses/psychological traumas are under "guidance" in his dictionary as well.
He uses soft language, that means he's hiding something, and that something is his actual opinion about this, which is indifference as long as he keeps his job.
He will never admit the uselessness of PCR testing, the bribing of hospitals in exchange for covid death certificates, and the overall corruption that supports every official claim ever made about covid or the obvious career/money incentive behind mass media and big pharma. He will never doubt ANY vaccine unless given permission to do so.
He will rely on detailed specific technical exposition to avoid the big elephant in the room. He will never admit that covid, or ANY other virus, is not worth what was done to our countries and the people in it. Everything is always going to be something he doesn't know or something that could or could not be and he will eventually agree with some of the points someone makes just to play it safe and keep the useless discussion going.
What's even the point in asking him to explain things as if he was in charge?