Like secretary Pete?
Printable View
Can this be more blatant? Telegram: Contact @EnjoyTheD
What kind of a farm animal "vaccinates" its children against a disease that does not affect children? Are you so concerned that we know you didn't vote for Donald Trump that you not only continue to wear The Mask but you knowingly expose your children to this shit just to make a statement?
Where is that damn muzzle when its needed!
"Animal Farm" animals of course!
This is a really interesting conversation about the future of free speech on the internet with Viva, Barnes, and Rumble CEO.
Timcast IRL - Elon Musk Twitter Meeting LEAKED By Veritas w/Viva, Barnes & Rumble CEO - YouTube
You can do basically anything to people, even murder them, if you commit hard enough and do it with a smile. Most of us can't be this manipulative. These are theatrical people. If we could out manipulate them, maybe we could win. But is it really necessary, or even possible? Barbarians intimidate, not manipulate. Manipulation isn't necessary when the intimidation has real teeth. Fangs must be shown. Collectively, of course. Lone wolf shit isn't going to do anything except sell news. But how this happens collectively, I have no idea.
They never found any safety signals, because they didn't look for them.
New FOIA Release Shows CDC Lied About Its VAERS Safety Monitoring Efforts
FDA Discusses one of the confirmed cases linked to side effects of mRNA products from clinical trials for babies + kids: a 1 yr old suffered multiple seizures but continued in the trial to receive a 2nd dose despite an investigator confirming it caused seizures.
INFANTsâ›”Vaccine SEIZURES
They seem to be actually trying to kill us.
Quote:
Back in September, I published an article in CHD’s The Defender, where I showed the alarming and unambiguous safety signals coming from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), using the CDC’s own published methodology. In that article, I wondered out loud why, if the safety signals were so blaringly obvious, nobody was doing anything. Was anybody listening?
Well, it turns out the CDC wasn’t even looking for safety signals! They said they were going to use the most basic, standard pharmacovigilance method by calculating what are called proportional reporting ratios (PRR’s) to monitor VAERS (see the article linked above for more details). But it turns out they didn’t. And then they turned around and said they weren’t seeing any safety signals in VAERS. They forgot to mention that they weren’t looking for any.
They took a page from the pharma playbook: don’t look for safety problems, then claim that absence of evidence is evidence of absence. Maybe they think it’s OK if you do it with your fingers crossed behind your back.
Let’s rewind a bit. See, in late January of 2021, the CDC released a briefing document outlining the agency’s standard operating procedures (SOP) for ongoing monitoring of VAERS for safety signals from COVID-19 vaccines. The document describes the analyses that the VAERS team at the CDC’s own Immunization Safety Office was going to conduct in their “unprecedented” effort to monitor the safety of the new COVID-19 vaccines. This included a plan to produce weekly tables of the incidence of about forty different adverse events. They would also engage in data mining using PRRs and create tables with the results (you can read the document at the link above for more details - see esp. sections 2.2-2.5):
At my request, the amazing legal team at CHD submitted a FOIA request to CDC asking for:
Copies of the weekly tables they said they would produce from Feb 1-Sept. 30, 2021.
Copies of all tables, analyses and reports generated in connection with ‘Signal Detection Analyses’ as described in sections 2.3 and 2.5 of the SOP document, also from Feb 1-Sept. 30.
Well guess what? In their response letter they state that “no PRRs were conducted by CDC” and that “data mining is outside of the agency’s purview” even though their own SOP document from January stated they would do data mining.