I just use my retard test instead. If someone uses the word "debunked" and throws a bunch of cathedral articles at me with no analysis of his own, or indication that he even understood your arguments, that person is a retard and I adjust my expectations of him accordingly. There is a 99.9% chance every single one of Steve's 11 responses would have been ignored or dismissed in a similar fashion.
You know the first and only thing "Rob" did was google "Steve Kirsch", received authoritative guidance on what to think about him, then deleted the email. Sometimes you just have to accept that you can't fix retards. If there is at least a spark of curiosity or willingness to engage, maybe, but the Rob guy in Steve's example showed absolutely none. He took his orders like a good little retarded soldier, then went back to doing whatever retarded shit he does during his day and never thought about it again.