Reply With Quotethis is a cult. just like all the others you've read about over the years. drink the kool-aid, save the panet, meet your maker.Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe
Member
JAYSUS! So it wasn't just for the cell reception. Or to kill your keeds. It was to paint you for missile strikes! Why bother using the phone that's in your pocket, when they can use the nanobots in your skin. And ofc, it's to get the ones who complied, they're the ones worth shooting rockets at!
sMoKeY, we aren't War criminal loving, religiously motivated nut bags! You aRe Da Sheeps. We smart enough not to let the government blow us up with bio targeted missiles!
Imagine checking back to see if, transparent, ego motivated, acts of revenge on civilians might have slightly swayed your opinion. Nope "the vax got tracers in it." Fucking amazing.
Member
this is a cult. just like all the others you've read about over the years. drink the kool-aid, save the panet, meet your maker.
Member
Obviously, the reasons for this are ethnic ones - and can't be noticed out loud, because otherwise you'll be accused of a pathological and irrational desire to single out and hate this one particular group of people. This is a third rail issue. You touch this, and you'll get cancelled.
Member
There has been a 0.3 increase in the population of the United States in 2022. People are obviously dying of the vexxx, but I don’t see how circumstances warrant an idea of a massive population reduction.
Member
I didn’t know whether to laugh or weep
The US Army can't keep its priorities straight
Member
JP Morgan Chase CEO changes tune on ESG investing as movement takes dive | America'''s Frontline News
Reuters: Nobody said vaccine would stop transmission | America's Frontline News
WEF admits COVID restrictions preliminary compliance test for upcoming carbon emissions restrictions - Analysis | America's Frontline News
✓ Member
Holodomor - Wikipedia
Looks like basically one, from 2017...but the point certainly stands. The supposed Stalin quote about a single death vs. a million deaths was supposedly in the context of the Holodomor, interestingly enough.
The point I think you're getting at about persecution of the majority is interesting. For those who haven't read it, the epilogue to C.S. Lewis's The Screwtape Letters, "Screwtape Proposes a Toast" had some fairly prescient descriptions of the social dynamics we see in spades now of self-oppression and how it's come about with the politics of the current age. It may be that a sort of auto-persecution is a necessity for this scale of majority oppression. Material impact aside, the social dynamics alone display it.
Not that social dynamics lack material consequences, of course...
Member
As Jordan Peterson once said, "It's not they love the planet, it's the fact that they hate humanity."
Why is it that almost always, the climate change alarmists live in a concrete jungle? Most of them couldn't name more than one or two species of trees in the nearest forest.
Member
As if voting will matter in such a situation. The useful idiots often get slaughtered first because they are the easiest targets. Predators don't waste time on the weird little animal with spikes and fangs when there is a deer with a broken leg near by.
The vaxx is very novel and there are too many unknowns, so forget about it for a minute. Who would disproportionately be killed in engineered famine? Basically the same people. The ones who trust and don't prepare. I.e. "their voters".
TMPHBITEU
Fascinating, that China has not invaded Taiwan. They must not want it very badly.At the time when the Army most needs the support of the nation to persuade young people to join its ranks, it is busy releasing climate strategies. What message does that send?
Here's a piece from Reuters. Despite their hedging in the copy, the links they post here are quite informative: Fact Check-Preventing transmission never required for COVID vaccines’ initial approval; Pfizer vax did reduce transmission of early variants | Reuters
Yes, the COVID trial run told them what they needed to know. Bumping this:This reminds me of the old television commercial, “4 out 5 physicians prefer Camels.” Which makes you wonder what the nebbish 5th physician prefers. There is an off-color answer to this question. I won’t go there.
And what about those remaining 3% of scientists? What do they think and why? And who are these 97% of scientists? Where did that number come from?
The truth is, there is no consensus. The Oregon Petition signed by more than 31,000 scientists and experts declare that,
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.
So, from whence 97% of scientists. Larry Bell reported in Forbes way back in 2012, that the source is a 2009 American Geophysical Union survey comprising two questions.
The first: ‘When compared with pre-1800s levels,do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?” Few would be expected to dispute this. . . . the planet began thawing out of the “Little Ice Age” in the middle 19th century, predating the Industrial Revolution. (That was the coldest period since the last real Ice Age ended roughly 10,000 years ago.)
The second question asked: “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?”
Of the 10,257 earth scientists who received the survey about 3,000 responded. Of these, "77 who had been successful in getting more than half of their papers recently accepted by peer-reviewed climate science journals were considered in the survey statistic. That ‘98% all scientists’ referred to . . . 75 of those 77 who answered ‘yes’.”
This is the basis for turning our world topsy turvy. And you can see why this reminds me of the cigarette commercial. They are both misleading propaganda.
CO2 Coalition
Really, think about this: A 4.6 billion-year-old planet with an 8000-mile diameter, with a molten core (heat, etc.), with an atmosphere that is only 50 miles/240,000ft thick (being rather generous), that orbits a star only 93 million miles away with 330,000 times the earth's mass and that emits enough radiation to burn your naked ass in 30 minutes, is having its weather unalterably changed over the course of the next 5/10/15 years (whatever it is now) by the presence of a weak greenhouse gas, CO2, that happens to now be at its lowest level in damn near the entire history of the planet -- a history punctuated by global glaciations while that weak greenhouse gas was far higher than it is now -- and that also happens to be the basis of plant life (and therefore atmospheric oxygen), a gas whose greenhouse effect is dwarfed by that of water vapor (on a planet with a surface area that consists of 70% water), and that geologically is currently in an interglacial period. The models that generated this political bullshit have predicted nothing correctly -- not sea level change, polar ice cover, or weather.
And everybody believes it anyway, to the extent that they are handing the management of the world's economy to elderly megalomaniacs with an agenda based on their own personal power. You're not even allowed to question it -- otherwise sensible people have agreed with the ridiculous premise that CO2 is a deadly poison that must be eliminated from the surface of the earth. Every August, everybody runs around like it's not supposed to be hot. Every time there's a drought, everybody acts like it's the very first time it's been dry too long. "Hurricane season" started in June, and how many hurricanes have devastated the coastlines already inundated by the molten ice caps? How many times over the past 20 years of this shit have the hurricane predictions been correct?
Really, the children are in charge now, seeking validation for "caring about the planet," running around yelling about "carbon" -- the 4th most abundant element in the physical universe --being a deadly poison. Their managers are common criminals whose entire agenda is money and control, and we are letting it happen. It is the result of the shitty science education we received in the government schools, and it probably cannot be stopped.
Posting Permissions