Elon tried to appease the ADL, met with Greenblatt, and kept SJW and rabid enemy of free speech Yoel Roth on as "head of safety and integrity". Despite this, the ADL stabbed him in the back only three days later, telling corporations to suspend advertising on twitter. And unlike every conservative-led boycott ever, all of the biggest corporations immediately fell in line. Sure, Kanye might be bipolar on a manic episode, but he isn't wrong.
Sure, but are they actually seeing what they claim to see? Or are they literally just making this shit up? That's what I'm curious about. The interpretation is whole other can of worms.
That is certainly true in some cases, but dismissing all such possibilities out of hand lets propaganda/rhetorical concerns have a veto on honest inquiry. It's possible that the truth could be so crazy that no one would believe it (at least until everyone agrees that it's no longer embarrassing to believe it).
This same psychological pattern is why so many are completely incapable of believing how much of a scam COVID and the vaccines were. "Everyone lied" is beyond the border of their credulity, while the crazy bio-machine stuff is beyond the border of yours.
I have said this before, I will say it again. If they had the ability to create nanobots that attack us like this, they would not need to have them injected directly into us. Such nanobots could be placed in food, and in drink. They could also be made to just invade the body from the outside without anyone noticing, as that is how small they would be.
Dude, it could be something as simple as an identification tool. It doesn't have to be some fantastical sci-fi tech that turns you into a cyborg controlled from DC. If massive social unrest/civil conflict is something they anticipate, a simple and quick way to ID people in the field will be valuable. It would also make a good explanation for why healthy, young soldiers are still under so much pressure to be "vaccinated" with such a worthless and dangerous injection.
I will believe it as soon as I see a Bluetooth speaker which will keep a connection for more than three days.
I am not dismissing anything out of hand. But exceptional claims demand exceptional evidence. In the case of the CoVid lethality or vaccine efficacy, data was out there that enabled anyone to work out whether the claims were accurate or exaggerated.
Imho, those who claim the vaccine plants nano-robots or similar stuff in the receiver have not produced any evidence of similar quality. There is convincing evidence that some batches were contaminated with various substances, but that doesn't stretch far enough to validate the more outlandish claims.
And while we are on the subject of psychological patterns, people who subscribe to the mainstream narrative of an event will ignore any inconsistencies and find a way to reconcile even the most egregious logical fallacies. At the same time, they will point out the slightest error made by those who go against the narrative, and use them as precedents to label them as quacks and disqualify them from the debate.
So, imho, it behooves (to use a verb that the host of this forum loves) people fighting the mainstream narrative to be absolutely rigorous, and avoid spreading unsubstantiated claims.
IPB
AGAIN, such nanobots would not need to be injected into the person directly, they could be hidden in all sorts of things that soldiers routinely have to do that are otherwise harmless and raise no suspicion. The reason this shit is being forced on our military is because its commander-in-chief is a demented hyper-partisan who is probably benefiting financially from the sales of the COVID shots.