Ok before we go too far into the weeds on this part.
Lets take a step back, and can you now explain to me what the benefits of Bitcoin are that the Government is unable to interdict?
Printable View
In my own conversations I say “Covid” as an all encompassing way of expressing your nit above. Of course, I agree with you while also feeling like this could very well be the case for Tucker.
It’s easier just to say “Covid” (meaning this Covid mess) than “totalitarian government policies”. It’s an implied understatement.
On a side note, I’ve noticed (anecdotally) a significant uptick in mask wearing in Seattle. It’s truly astonishing.
I get it, you want to associate the thoughts with a designated (and almost certainly manufactured) bad thinker. But it's just something almost anyone might observe if they weren't under the common hypnosis. If I do, in fact, sound like Anglin, it's probably because he's designed to sound like me.
Tangential fun fact: Vox Day believes Andrew Anglin isn't even one person.
CDC to Implement International Classification of Disease Codes for COVID Vaccine Status • Children's Health Defense
What Would It Look Like? - by Etana Hecht and Ashmedai
Crooks Who Approved "Covid Vaxx" approved Other "Childhood Vaccines" Also
------
Chief Nerd:
Jefferey Jaxen on Rep. Louie Gohmert Filing Bill H.R.9366 to Finally Hold Pharma Accountable
“[It] amends the Public Health Service Act to hold vaccine manufacturers liable for those injuries caused by the vaccine”
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/sta...teu_a4fjg&s=19
-------
Jordan Peterson Exposes The World Economic Forum | With Joe Rogan - YouTube
The Bitcoin mining machines (ASIC) can be compared to computers or smartphones. But the Internet is not a computer just like Bitcoin is not an ASIC machine. What are governments going to do? Ban the production of ASIC machines which by now is a multi billion dollar business?
Fine, we'll just go back to mining bitcoins on a regular computer, because that's how the technology is designed. Are they gonna ban those too?
How far is your hypothetical superpowerful government lord willing to go?
The ONLY variable I don't trust and that makes me doubtful is just people, which there's a lot of, who are willing to just say yes and do what they're told, because they see themselves as "serfs". Luckily, many people who work at Bitcoin are not like that, which is why the technology is so hard to attack.
It's decentralized, anonymous (although not completely) and private (peer-to-peer, like cash).
Think about it as cash, that doesn't have a specific source and that you can exchange with someone without having to know who they are or them knowing who you are.
I'll ask you a similar question:
How easy is it for the government to interdict the fiat money you are using right now compared to interdicting Bitcoin and its use as a currency?