Reply With QuoteAn Invitation to the Future - YouTubeOriginally Posted by Mark Rippetoe
This is an interesting initiative and probably more effective. Say what you want about Peterson, but he seems to be using his influence for a good purpose.
TMPHBITEU
No, but I hadn't seen the list.
Member
An Invitation to the Future - YouTube
This is an interesting initiative and probably more effective. Say what you want about Peterson, but he seems to be using his influence for a good purpose.
Member
Kinda funny how Bernard Baruchs monetary and political policies were being implemented around the time of the 1918 pandemic. These policies paved the ground for FDRs New Deal. Mark Twain once said that “History never repeats itself, but it does often rhyme.” Not in This case. It appears they had a working model so they followed the same cookbook.
Member
Yes, only in 2020 they had shitty operatives, so very little was actually achieved.
Member
That balloon was worse than Jan 6th protest, which was worse than Pear Harbor!
TMPHBITEU
The balloon was another test. We didn't fail the test at Pearl Harbor.
Member
The Pfizer Documents They Wanted to Keep Hidden for 75 Years Reveal Unimaginable Atrocities Against Babies & Children
----------------------------
Are covid vaccines coding for what they claim to? (and was this willfully ignored?)
Japanese Researchers Sue the Government for Hiding Inconvenient Truths About the Jab - DailyClout
Brazil legislation proposes 2-8 years imprisonment for vaccine criticism | Frontline News
This guy is fascinating. One of the issues he discusses here is the Hockey Stick fallacy.
They're Lying to Us About Global Warming | Randall Carlson - YouTube
Member
Query to the more technically minded military buffs.
The balloon was supposedly at 58,000 feet and shot down by an F-22.
What anti air capability is available to shoot something down at that height?
Member
No surprises here:
Do mask mandates work?
A look at the evidence
link
Spoiler:
This is based off a Cochrane Review, which is "A Cochrane Review is a systematic review of research in health care and health policy that is published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews." - a kind of meta-analysis.Interestingly, 12 trials in the review, ten in the community and two among healthcare workers, found that wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to influenza-like or Covid-19-like illness transmission. Equally, the review found that masks had no effect on laboratory-confirmed influenza or SARS-CoV-2 outcomes. Five other trials showed no difference between one type of mask over another.
But, you know, we can probably dismiss the article because it's not written by anyone important:
More worryingly, the author wrote on their substack about some journos trying to contact them.Carl Heneghan is professor of evidence-based medicine at the University of Oxford. Dr Tom Jefferson is a Clinical epidemiologist and Senior Associate Tutor at the University of Oxford.
EG "Please restate your points to fit my pre-conceived narrative."However, we recently got another query which underlines the points made in the previous posts. This request comes from a very powerful press syndicate:
“I’m reaching out because I’ve been seeing some posts [links redacted by TJ] spreading widely on social media that seem to be misrepresenting the conclusions of your recently published study on physical interventions and respiratory viruses.
Do you think it is a misrepresentation to claim (as the tweets I link to above do) that your study definitively proves that masks don’t work in preventing the spread of viruses such as COVID-19 and the flu? If so, I’d be interested in debunking these claims to set the record straight and would love to speak with you more about the study”.
Member
In one way, we surely did; but, the one that counted, we passed with flying colors.
Posting Permissions