Yes, it's obvious that the Democrat Party is insufficiently Marxist.
Printable View
The Marxists have always recognized the necessity of capitalism and enriching politicians going all the way back to the original doctrines.
They only see the complete removal of capitalism as possible in the final stage, when there is global communist control under a single government.
I can't wait for them to tell us we are all required to wear the exact same clothes, like they did in China! It will be great fun, comrade.
And soon enough it'll be the metaphorical diseases of ideas that qualify some of us.
This was video interesting. I'd be curious how many people are actually going to sack up at some point. Most people are talking shit on social media and then complying at every turn. I am routinely the only person without a mask in public.
They'll probably only give a nod in the general direction of my house instead of actually calling the Gestapo. They're not total cowards, after all.
https://twitter.com/Semmelweis7/stat...95473547231232
When the US does Presidential elections we do them big. Up for re-election at the Federal level are ALL members of the House of Representatives and typically 1/3 of the Senate in any such 4 year cycle. This was purposely built in from the start.
At the state and local levels, it's much the same, although only 11 governors are up for election this cycle. I suppose one could hope that CA and NY would oust theirs, but those states are so deeply blue it seems vain to hope for. Illinois is not up for election of a governor, but as blue as it is, that balance can shift marginally enough to elect a republican if the outer parts of the Shitcago metro area suburbs and their counties don't vote for dems. Given the anger ginned up over the Kung Flu in those counties this year, Pritzker could get dumped. In addition, a Federal probe of dem politicos has taken several scalps already and looks likely to bring down their speaker of the state house. So perhaps some major changes could happen in this state given the disarray that seems pending.
Texas leaders want to freeze property taxes for cities defunding police | The Texas Tribune
Abbot putting the smack down on this silly fuck of a mayor we have here in Austin.
Meanwhile, even the liberals are getting tired of the homeless situation here. We need to get this fucking mayor and city council out before they completely fuck this city up.
While penis masks (a.k.a condoms) are strongly recommended to prevent sexually transmitted diseases, they have never been required or legally enforced. My understanding is that the science behind penis masks is not controversial and is considered to be very effective. Penis masks clearly save lives.
Can anyone explain the rational for advocating COVID mask policy but no penis mask policy?
They just have no consent from much of the population because no campaign geared at creating false fear has taken place for penis masks.
See how effective the virus fear-mongering has been:
https://twitter.com/brithume/status/1295693228096839681
This is strictly a function of the propaganda. The media have done their job among a susceptible public in a spectacularly effective way.
Quote:
Six months into this pandemic, Americans still dramatically misunderstand the risk of dying from COVID-19:
On average, Americans believe that people aged 55 and older account for just over half of total COVID-19 deaths; the actual figure is 92%.
Americans believe that people aged 44 and younger account for about 30% of total deaths; the actual figure is 2.7%.
Americans overestimate the risk of death from COVID-19 for people aged 24 and younger
by a factor of 50; and they think the risk for people aged 65 and older is half of what it actually is (40% vs 80%).
https://www.franklintempletonnordic....20-ch2-630.svgQuote:
This misperception translates directly into a degree of fear for one’s health that for most people vastly exceeds the actual risk: we find that the share of people who are very worried or somewhat worried of suffering serious health consequences should they contract COVID-19 is almost identical across all age brackets between 25 and 64 years old, and it’s not far below the share for people 65 and older.
The discrepancy with the actual mortality data is staggering: for people aged 18–24, the share of those worried about serious health consequences is 400 times higher than the share of total COVID deaths; for those age 25–34 it is 90 times higher. The chart below truly is worth a thousand words:
Propaganda is a powerful tool.
Since you mention Plandemic, the 2nd one was just published: Plandemic II: InDoctorNation
What's it about? Well, the first few minutes show clips from the Oct, 2019 "Event 201" when leaders/experts gamed out the coronavirus pandemic. I don't have the stomach to watch it, but perhaps some of you will get something out of it.