Listening to you recently has been like listening to Adam Schiff.
Printable View
Thanks for your reply.
I seem to remember someone posting the review on the Corman & Drosten paper (Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020 – CORMAN-DROSTEN REVIEW REPORT), in which it states that so far nobody has been able to isolate a live Sars-Cov-2 and that its existence has been derived from a "reconstruction" of sorts.
Is that true, and if so, how does the current testing with PCR (which in itself doesn't even seem reliable at all) make any sense?
Couple of things:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1334778246446129154
War Room: Pandemic Ep 559 - YouTube
Amazing to many of us, that the MSM kept the Russia/Ukraine bullshit going for 4 years on less evidence than is contained in these two links.
Go and read my post above. No one wants to look behind the curtain because neither side wants their blue-pilled rank and file to know that they are just as crooked as the other side, except perhaps those who delusionally believe in "accountability" or some other nonsense when applied to government. Everyone seems to have no trouble remembering major socio-political events that occurred 20 years prior, except when they involve one of the sacraments of the state religion.
To paraphrase Dave Smith, this idea that the state, upon assumption of absolute power, will somehow be trusted to restrain itself, when comprised of people who are simply as corruptible and flawed and human as everyone they assume dominance over is truly bizarre. It is the utopian philosophy, maybe more so than pure communism.
And who signs up to troll debate politics on a weight lifting message board anyway?
There has been clear and obvious conspiracy to cheat during the election and there has also been clear and obvious conspiracy to pretend it hasn't happened.
Anyone with a 120+ IQ and even a yellow belt in Google-Fu knows this is the case.
So yeah, when someone argues against it, when it is literally their job to know better, I'm going to question their motives and involvememnt in either of these conspiracies.
And the lying starts with themselves.
Most of the Trump worship accusations, usually from people who jerked off to Obama for eight years, is just more gaslighting.
I think he's probably been the best president of my lifetime, which isn't that high a bar anyway, but I've been super critical of where i think he's screwed the pooch. And you're correct: my concerns are for the long game of good and transparent governance. I think a second Trump term is a step closer to that, especially compared to the Sniffer and the Sucker, but I don't have a political crush on the guy, like his enemies want to paint all of his supporters.
Except there wasn't, dumbass. There was a fabricated story paid for by the DNC. Everyone under oath had jack shit to say about actual evidence.
Unlike hundreds of sworn affidavits, video evidence, a long trail of bad actors involved in the counting and technology used to count, and numbers that anyone with basic statistical and probability skills knows are BS.
So basically nothing alike.
Were you?
Absolutely no argument here.
I see someone testifying about clearly suspect things involving the election on one side. The rebuttal from the other side consists of "baseless claims" repeated over and over again, followed by media blackouts and deleting the social media accounts of people who testify. If you don't see this as further evidence that these claims are not "baseless" you are a hopeless robot who has shut off the humanity switch in your fucking brain.
We have seen a death rate of ~7% (1/15) for high risk populations from the high dose cohort in the Phase II Moderna vaccine trial. That is higher than the death rate from the virus.
Philadelphia Priest Dies After Participating In Moderna COVID Vaccine Trial | Zero Hedge
80% of all participants developed systemic side effects after the 2nd dose in Moderna's phase I and II trials.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483
These are extremely concerning results that would typically shut down a trial completely or result in a lengthy delay and reevaluation of the trail.
We do not know that.
That is an untested hypothesis.
This is why we are supposed to have long-term trials before a vaccine (especially a new type of vaccine) is ever approved.
Don't forget your Hippocratic Oath: First, do no harm.