How do the boards feel about Senator Hawley as a potential candidate in 2024? The guy seems to have a pair.
Printable View
How do the boards feel about Senator Hawley as a potential candidate in 2024? The guy seems to have a pair.
I am glad you have clarified that you read the studies, JF.
If you have read the studies, you know they all list and discuss pregnancy and fertility complications as a potential side effect that must be monitored and evaluated.
Now, tell me which of these two scenarios is true:
1. Are you lying about having read the studies? You didn't actually read them, despite claiming otherwise and slandering me for only reading overviews and conclusions?
2. You read the studies, knew about the potential side effects, including potential pregnancy, birth or fertility complications, but decided to intentionally and knowingly give false and misleading medical advice in an unofficial setting?
Keep digging that hole, JF.
You do not believe medical professionals should be held to the standards they committed themselves to and swore to under oath?
For anyone who may be interested in further reading:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
https://www.lifesitenews.com/images/...9_vaccines.pdf
Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults - PubMed
https://static-content.springer.com/...7%2C253%2C0%5D
No, I don’t think so. That minimizes the problem, which is:
(1) technically-minded people adopt an extremely narrow perception of what “their job” is (such as scrutinizing medical terminology and statistical calculations, but not considering the context in which science is applied to public health),
(2) errors occur at interfaces or boundaries (such as deceivingly ambiguous headlines and misinterpreted lab tests), and
(3) bad actors systematically exploit this myopia to further their agendas.
It’s not about personality disorder - it’s about understanding your professional responsibilities in an adversarial environment.
Desantis/ Hawley would be a good ticket. That's if it's not Trump/ Desantis that is. Obviously Trump could be term limited at that time.
Is it safe to assume that the texas v thieves case at the Supreme Court is the final attempt or is there more out there if that fails?
Which study are you talking about now? I was talking about the one you posted where you said 1/15 people died, and the study did not say that. I don’t read everything people link to around here, but I definitely read everything that I link to. I think that is a basic standard of discussion, but maybe that’s not universal. I am after all, a narrow-minded pedant.
I don’t give medical advice over the internet to people who are not already my patients. Sharing my opinion about public health matters does not constitute medical advice, by the way. Please do not act on anything I say here. Also, the hot beverage you are about to consume is hot.
People who like to remind doctors of the Hippocratic tend to be the same kind of people who lecture traffic cops about the constitution when they get pulled over for speeding. Maybe not wrong, but definitely tedious. Entertaining sometimes, but usually not interesting when all is said and done.