Everything the MSM has done and said (or rather, refused to do or say) in the aftermath of the election shows a very culpable negligence, and lends lots of credence to the fraud claims. If they were interested in informing the public and truly believed they were false, they would go into them in depth and pull apart the claims. "Experts say..." doesn't count. As for the judges, they are too scared to be "that judge who invalidated millions of votes." I worry that this fear does not stop at the doors of the supreme court. These lawsuits have largely been getting shut down due to procedural reasons, not because the evidence is bad. There isn't really precedent to work with when it comes to suing over election fraud, and these judges are all too happy to jump on some weak technicality to keep from having to rule on the case.