You mean the one that uses the word “assume” 23 times in it’s twenty pages and is based primarily on data provided by the CCP, who coincidentally? is one of the many entities that will be profiting enormously by this crisis?Second, everybody keeps saying "the models were wrong" -- but that just shows that nobody bothers actually reading the papers. I did. The Imperial College paper from which the 2.2M estimate for an unchecked outbreak came from, also *explicitly* presented a wide variety of scenarios *with interventions*.
Are we stuck in this logical quagmire because you are that naive or because we are that cynical?